In its February fundraising letter, the ACLU accused pro-life forces of “adopting sensational, exploitative and viciously deceptive language. In this case, they did it by shamelessly naming the procedure they are trying to ban a `partial birth abortion.'” The shame is that the ACLU sees the injection of a needle into the brains of partially delivered babies a constitutional right. But what else would we expect of an organization that has auctioned off a free abortion as part of its fundraising schemes?
