New York Times Shows Bias In Abuse Reporting

///New York Times Shows Bias In Abuse Reporting

New York Times Shows Bias In Abuse Reporting

Newspapers are expected to print news, but that was most certainly not the case on May 19 with the New York Times.

It ran a story of almost 800 words on the compensation program of the New York Archdiocese for victims of sexual abuse. There was nothing new in the article: The names of the six priests, who committed their offenses in the 1970s and 1980s, had already been made public. So what was the point? None of the priests are in ministry and five were booted.

It could be argued that the New York Times has an obligation to cover everything and anything about the sexual abuse of minors. But that is simply not true.

Two days earlier, the media reported on the arrest of the executive director of a Queens music school for children. Oliver Sohngen, the founder of the Long Island City Academy of Music, was charged with sex trafficking and attempted sex trafficking of girls 8 to 17. After he got a pimp to supply him with the 8-year-old, he dropped her off at Chuck E. Cheese’s so her parents wouldn’t think anything was wrong.

Over a dozen media outlets covered this story, but not the New York Times.

Why did the New York Times run a story about sexual abuse in the Archdiocese of New York that took place a generation ago—containing not a single item of news—but failed to report on a breaking-news story about a public school official who was arrested for recently abusing little girls?

The bias is palpable. It is also indefensible.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
By | 2017-07-24T19:43:29+00:00 July 24th, 2017|Categories: Catalyst, Features|Tags: |Comments Off on New York Times Shows Bias In Abuse Reporting