WAR ON THE BISHOPS

AR2014-CoverThe following is an excerpt of a Special Report by Bill Donohue, originally published in the September edition of Catalyst.

The Catholic Church has many enemies these days, some of whom are ex-Catholics who left the Church a long time ago. They are joined by the disaffected, those who pretend (even convincing themselves) that they are Catholics in good standing. Most of these malcontents are lay men and women, but some are priests, and not a few are nuns. All of them are animated by a strong rejection of the Church’s teachings on sexuality. Because they have the support of the secular media, they comprise a formidable group.

What motivates them today is the debased desire to take down a bishop. Not any bishop: They want to drop a bishop who is an outspoken defender of the faith. They really get excited when they learn of a diocese that was riddled with dissidents and is now almost dissident free.

Geopolitics is at work, as well. While they will work overtime to disable a bishop anywhere in the nation, they prefer to scalp a bishop from the mid-west. Why? Because that’s where many of them live. It’s also because it is easier for activists to dominate the news in mid-sized cities, as opposed to larger ones where it is much more difficult. Their attacks are orchestrated and well-coordinated: lawyers feed the activists and they feed the media.

Cardinal Raymond Burke, formerly the Archbishop of St. Louis and then the prefect of the Vatican’s highest court, has drawn the enmity of mid-western dissidents for years. He is despised because of his denunciations of Catholic public figures who reject the Church’s teachings that bear on public policy issues. Burke’s critics have no problem with the Nancy Pelosis who continually claim their Catholic status while doing everything they can to undermine the Church. They have a problem with him.

New York Archbishop Timothy Cardinal Dolan hails from St. Louis and was the Milwaukee archbishop before coming to the Big Apple. He is hated because he cleaned up after his disgraced predecessor, Archbishop Rembert Weakland. Though Weakland embarrassed himself and the Church, he is still revered in left-wing Catholic quarters. He is liked because his views are similar to theirs.

They tried to take Dolan down because he moved the perpetual care fund, which was part of the regular archdiocesan accounts, to a cemetery trust fund. It did not matter that he was following the advice of his Financial Council; what mattered was that his enemies could play fast-and-loose with a contrived controversy. When Dolan moved to New York, they stayed on his trail. Terence McKiernan, the founder of BishopAccountability, pledged a few years ago to “stick it” to Dolan, and has accused him of “keeping the lid on 55 priests.” Several attempts challenging McKiernan to release the names have failed. It’s a lie and he knows it.

When Bishop John Myers of Peoria took over the Newark archdiocese, his enemies followed him. They went wild when it was learned that a priest was not being properly supervised after he had an encounter with a teenager 12 years earlier; he grabbed the boy while wrestling with him (in front of the boy’s mother). In fact, what was really bothering his critics were Myers’ strong positions on sexuality. The editorial page editor of the Newark Star-Ledger, an angry ex-Catholic, specifically took umbrage with Myers for his defense of “marriage and life.”

Bishop Robert Finn of Kansas City-St. Joseph inherited a mess made by dissidents and cleaned it up. That made him a target. His enemies seized on the antics of a disturbed priest who took crotch-shot pictures of kids. It is important to note that the review board was contacted, the authorities were notified, and an independent investigation was ordered. But because much more offensive photos were later taken, Finn was found guilty of one misdemeanor for not reporting suspected child abuse. Had he done nothing, no one would have known about the priest because there was no complainant. No matter, they wanted his head and are still after him.

St. Louis Archbishop Robert Carlson was recently the victim of a campaign by anti-Catholics who tried to frame him. Their goal was to promote the pernicious idea that he did not know that child abuse was against the law. It failed, but what counts is that they tried. Because Carlson fought back, and because he rejects the libertine ideas of his critics, they sought to bring him down.

No one has endured a more vicious assault on his character than John Nienstedt, Archbishop of St. Paul and Minneapolis. In order to understand the motivations behind these attacks, we need to disclose who the principal players are in this quest to scalp a bishop.

Attorney Jeffrey Anderson, the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (SNAP), and the National Catholic Reporter are leading the charge. Anderson is from St. Paul, SNAP honcho David Clohessy lives in St. Louis, and the Reporter’s home is Kansas City, Missouri. All of them find a sympathetic ear with the media.

The Kansas City Star, the Minneapolis Star Tribune, and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch are their biggest fans. Outside of the mid-west, they have friends at the New York Times, Boston Globe, National Public Radio and Commonweal magazine; the latter has become increasingly strident.

Examples of some of the attacks on bishops that the Catholic League addressed in 2014 follow.

June 10
Archdiocese of St. Louis – On June 9, attorney Jeff Anderson released video clips from a May 23 deposition transcript of St. Louis Archbishop Robert Carlson. It was vintage Anderson: he misrepresented the truth. The media, led by the editorial board of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, echoed the distortion.

The Post-Dispatch editorial said the following: “Mr. Anderson asked the archbishop if at the time [1984], he knew it was a crime for an adult to engage in sex with a child. ‘I’m not sure whether I knew it was a crime or not,’ Archbishop Carlson replied. ‘I understand today it is a crime.'” The editorial then hammered Carlson for his response, comparing him to “lawyered-up mobsters, politicians or Wall Street fraudsters.” The editorial board suggested that Archbishop Carlson “should resign and seek treatment for Alzheimer’s or some other form of dementia.”

However, what actually happened in the deposition was quite different than what the paper reported. The lead question in this exchange was never shown on the video clip. The question was: “Well, mandatory reporting laws went into effect across the nation in 1973, Archbishop.” At this point, Carlson’s lawyer, Charles Goldberg, interjected, “I’m going to object to the form of that question.” Anderson said he wanted to finish the question, and Goldberg agreed. Anderson then said to Carlson, “And you knew at all times, while a priest, having been ordained in 1970, it was a crime for an adult to engage in sex with a kid. You knew that right?” Goldberg jumped in again: “I’m going to object to the form of that question now. You’re talking about mandatory reporting.” Anderson agreed to rephrase it.

The Post-Dispatch editorial picked up at this point, never indicating that the question was predicated on Carlson’s knowledge of mandatory reporting laws in the 1980s. In other words, the video clip was rigged by Anderson to make the archbishop look as if he didn’t know it was a crime for an adult to have sex with a kid, and the media, led by the Post-Dispatch, published Anderson’s propaganda as if it were true. It was obvious that the media never independently verified Anderson’s selective account, for if they had they would have seen that not only was this exchange about mandatory reporting laws, but that the archbishop indicated several times in the same deposition that he knew it was a crime for a priest to have sex with a child.

Prior to the controversial exchange, Anderson asked Carlson several questions about Tom Adamson (a homosexual priest who had sex with teenage males). Carlson said, “I remember he was accused of sexual abuse. That’s the trial I participated in.” Having said as much, it was simply impossible to believe that Carlson did not know it was against the law for an adult to have sex with a minor.

Anderson also asked, “And you also knew when first degree criminal sexual conduct is written and recorded, that is the most serious of the sex crimes against a child. You know that?” To which Carlson said, “Correct.” This was further proof that Carlson knew what the law was; this was also said prior to the controversial exchange.

After the exchange in question, Anderson asked Carlson, “But you knew a priest touching the genitals of a kid to be a crime; did you not?” Carlson answered, “Yes.” Further exculpatory proof can be found throughout the deposition. On eight different occasions Carlson restated to Anderson that he told relatives of the victims to go to the police. He wouldn’t have done so unless he knew a crime may have been committed.

Archbishop Carlson was framed by Jeffrey Anderson and the media perpetuated his tale.

June 10 – 19
Archdiocese of San Francisco – Rep. Nancy Pelosi does not simply reject the Catholic Church’s teachings on marriage, abortion, and contraception—she is a rabid foe of the Church’s positions. However, she went beyond her usual stance by lecturing her archbishop on the folly of marriage, properly understood.

On June 19, San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone spoke at a Washington rally organized by the National Organization for Marriage. Pelosi urged him to cancel his plans because the event was not supported by her homosexual friends. Her unmitigated arrogance was on full display when she invoked a remark by Pope Francis. “If someone is gay and is searching for the Lord and has good will,” the Holy Father said, “then who am I to judge him?”

The pope’s comment had absolutely nothing to do with the institution of marriage; he was addressing homosexual individuals. Moreover, he said nothing that any of his predecessors would have found disagreeable.

Archbishop Cordileone responded to Pelosi as well as a motley group of public officials, community activists, religious leaders, and gay advocates who were also upset that he supports marriage, properly understood. It is a striking sociological moment when elites stage a protest of an archbishop in the Roman Catholic Church simply because he believes—as the whole world has believed for thousands of years—that marriage is the union of a man and a woman.

Those who are quick to brand support for traditional marriage hateful need to look in the mirror. As Archbishop Cordileone said in his excellent response to his critics, “for those who support the conjugal understanding of marriage, the attacks have not stopped at rhetoric. Simply for taking a stand for marriage as it has been understood in every human society for millennia, people have lost their jobs, lost their livelihoods, and have suffered other types of retribution, including physical violence.”

The archbishop, who is chairman of the bishops’ Subcommittee for the Promotion and Defense of Marriage, offered to meet with those offended by his participation in the march. He asked “before you judge us, get to know us.”

When gays go naked in the streets of San Francisco, and mock Catholicism in patently obscene ways, Pelosi is never offended. What offends her is her archbishop’s public defense of the Church’s teachings on marriage.

July 1 – August 1
Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis – An orchestrated crusade was carried out against St. Paul and Minneapolis Archbishop John Nienstedt by activist groups and the media with attorney Jeffrey Anderson, SNAP and the National Catholic Reporter leading the charge. They found a sympathetic ear in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, New York Times, Boston Globe, National Public Radio, Minnesota Public Radio, and Commonweal magazine. Jennifer Haselberger, a canon lawyer who resigned from the archdiocese earlier in the year provided the fuel for the attacks.

Haselberger is the darling of Commonweal, Minnesota Public Radio, and SNAP; she spoke at the latter’s conference in August. It is a source of great irony that she was suspended by the archdiocese for failing to deal expeditiously with a complaint, yet her signature complaint against the archdiocese was that it didn’t move expeditiously to deal with accused priests.

Over the summer, Haselberger submitted an affidavit to Anderson claiming to have endured “months of harassment, threats, and intimidation”; she pledged to provide examples. In fact, she provided not a single example of being threatened by anyone, and the examples that she offered of being harassed and intimidated are so weak they only work to undermine her credibility. Moreover, even she admits to at least 17 occasions where her version of events differed with that of her co-workers.

A week before Haselberger gave her affidavit, Commonweal printed a lengthy article detailing what she told them: the archbishop was under investigation for inappropriate sexual conduct with seminarians and former priests. Nienstedt announced the investigation on the same day, July 1, claiming innocence. She leaked this information after having learned of it from the law firm that was conducting an investigation, a probe initiated by Nienstedt.

Exactly one week after Haselberger’s uncontested affidavit was taken, Minnesota Public Radio aired a documentary that featured all the familiar players, complete with piped-in melodramatic music. For an outlet that prides itself on objectivity, it was nothing but a left-wing hit job. That teed things up for Anderson, who conveniently released Haselberger’s statement the next day. The day after that, Laurie Goodstein published her story in the New York Times, and two days later her newspaper published a scathing editorial on Nienstedt. On the same day, July 18, two journalists, one from the National Catholic Reporter, called for the archbishop to resign. This set the tone for Minnesota newspapers which then called for him to resign.

Nienstedt tried to reach out to the media to tell his side of the story, but what interested them was not his account, it was his sexuality. To be exact, they wanted to know what he did in bed, and with whom: three media outlets questioned him about his sexual behavior. He told the Star-Tribune, “No, I’m not gay. And I’m not anti-gay.” When asked by the Pioneer Press if he had had sex with men since becoming archbishop, he said, “No. Not even before.” A homosexual reporter for KMSP, Fox 9 Minneapolis, also asked the archbishop about his sexuality.

Those out to get Nienstedt cannot be shamed, but they can be stopped. Unfortunately, too many Catholic activists and writers who knew he was being railroaded went mute. It was apparent that the attacks were carefully orchestrated and well-coordinated: lawyers fed the activists and they fed the media.

August 20
Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph – The Kansas City Star issued its sixth call for the resignation of Bishop Robert Finn in three years. The occasion was a judge who agreed with the findings of an arbitrator that Finn had violated a 2008 agreement on policies regarding the reporting of child abuse.

The Star has been after Bishop Finn since 2010 when a computer technician found disturbing crotch shot photos of fully clothed girls on the computer of a priest; there was one naked photo of a non-sexual nature. A police officer and an attorney were contacted by the diocese and restrictions were placed on the priest. After the priest violated the restrictions Bishop Finn ordered an investigation even though there was no complainant. Porn pictures were discovered and Bishop Finn was convicted of not reporting suspected child abuse.

The Star’s impotence is a function of its misplaced authority: it has no legitimate perch upon which to tell Catholics who their bishop should be. Furthermore, its relentless attacks on Bishop Finn show a maniacal fixation that speaks more about its own problems than any alleged problems Finn has.

August 24
Diocese of Lafayette – The media, activists and dissident Catholics were up in arms over the decision of Lafayette Bishop Michael Jarrell not to publish the names of 15 priests who were accused of abuse prior to 1984. The list was not new and there were no new accusations of abuse; in fact all of the accused priests were either deceased or long-removed from ministry. Rather, victims’ advocates decided to target Bishop Jarrell and waged a media blitz in an attempt to shame the bishop. Bill Donohue was invited by the Daily Advertiser to write an op-ed in defense of Bishop Jarrell:

Kudos to Lafayette Bishop Michael Jarrell for not publishing the names of priests accused of a sexual offense. His decision is identical to the one that the leaders of every other institution, public and private, have long come to: it is unethical to do so. Why should the Catholic Church be any different?

A reporter came to my office a few years ago asking me about this issue. Specifically, she asked how I could defend a bishop for not posting the names of accused priests on his diocesan website. I immediately asked for her boss’ name and phone number. She wanted to know why. “Because I am going to report you for sexually harassing me, and then I want to see if your name is going to be posted on the website of your cable news employer.” She got the point.

I am the CEO of the Catholic League. If someone called me making an accusation against one of my staff members, I can assure you I would not call the cops. No employer would. I would do the same as everyone else: I would conduct my own internal investigation, and would only go to the authorities if I thought the charge was authentic.

There is a profound difference between an accusation, a credible accusation, a substantiated accusation, and a finding of guilt. The assumption behind all three levels of accusations is that the accused is innocent, yet this seems not to matter much anymore, especially when the accused is a priest.

The leader of a professional victims’ group maintains that we need to know the names of the credibly accused priests in Lafayette so that parents can protect their children. Nonsense. Of the 15 priests, seven are dead, five have moved away, and three are retired. None is in ministry. Moreover, all the accusations stem from alleged offenses dating back prior to 1984. In short, it is more than hype to suggest that kids are in danger—it is expressly demagogic, designed to whip up public sentiment against priests.

What is really sickening about this issue is that so many decent and innocent priests have had their reputations ruined by vicious accusers who remain anonymous. No one demands that we make public the names of the accusers, but somehow we are all supposed to know the identity of the accused. Correction: only when it comes to priests are demands made to publish the names of the accused.

The New York Times has a Business Ethics Policy that reads, “Any employee who becomes aware of any conduct that he or she believes to be prohibited by this Policy or a violation of the law…is expected to promptly report the facts forming the basis of that belief or knowledge to any supervisor of the legal department.”

In other words, crimes of a sexual nature need not be reported to the police, just the legal department. If this policy is good for reporters, why isn’t it good for bishops? The best part of the Times’ policy says that those who make false accusations are subject “to discipline up to and including termination.” The bishops should adopt this policy immediately.

I am so proud of Bishop Jarrell for acting fairly and courageously.

September
Diocese of Venice – Dissident lay Catholics in Southwest Florida, along with some priests, declared war on Bishop Frank Dewane. He is the Bishop of Venice and is by all accounts a loyal son of the Church. Which is why they were out to get him.

Dewane drew the ire of Catholic malcontents, and ex-Catholics, because of his orthodoxy. His critics are largely drawn from the ranks of the elderly, and are overrepresented by ex-priests and ex-nuns. They were being aided and abetted by the media. This occasioned a strong response from us: we took on Fox 4 TV, which covers Fort Myers, Cape Coral, and Naples.

The war on Bishop Dewane started in January when ten priests wrote a letter to the Apostolic Nuncio accusing the bishop of governing by “intimidation, the use of fear, shaming, bullying and other non-Christian behaviors.” The letter was made public in May when it was sent to the media, and unfolded in an unseemly manner this fall.

The accusing priests refused to come forward and let the accused know of their identity. In fact, they never sent Dewane a copy of their letter (he learned of it through the media). To make matters worse, these cowardly priests did not provide a scintilla of evidence: no specific examples of Dewane’s alleged “non-Christian” behavior were offered.

Dewane subsequently released a statement saying that the priests’ letter “lacks all credibility.” Furthermore, he said that the accusations are “sweeping generalities and are simply false or unfounded.” The statement concluded, “With the general nature of the unfounded complaints in the letter that was released, one has to wonder who is being bullied by whom?”

To answer the charges in the letter, Bishop Dewane convened a meeting of all the priests in the diocese. Most priests said that their complaining colleagues should have met with the bishop and handled this matter internally. That’s what real men do.

Not surprisingly, Call to Action and Voice of the Faithful, two wholly discredited groups, piled on. In a state of utter desperation, they reached out to Pope Francis, asking him to enter the fray. Their letter to him was replete with unsubstantiated accusations, and loaded with vitriol.

The Catholic League contacted every parish in the diocese rebutting the charges against Bishop Dewane. Bill Donohue also wrote a detailed letter to Fox 4 TV challenging their professionalism. The station offered a lengthy reply. While it was unconvincing, it was far less partisan than its reporting. We trust they got the message.

Screen shot 2015-05-27 at 12.17.31 PM

 




CHRISTOPHOBES ATTACK CHICK-FIL-A

It is the fastest growing phobia in the nation. Christophobia. To be sure, the fear of Christians is not overcoming America, but it has unquestionably overcome a large swath of non-believers, or those who profess no religious belief. Within this segment of the population, there are the indifferent at one end, and the haters at the other end.

If there is any doubt that the haters are growing, consider the overheated reaction by the New Yorker to a company that sells chicken sandwiches. Journalist Dan Piepenbring accuses Chick-fil-A of “carpet bombing” New York City. What did it do to merit such an accusation? It opened its fourth store in the Big Apple.

Why the ballistic response? The company is owned by practicing Christians. For instance, they believe marriage should be between a man and a woman. What else? That’s about it.

What few acknowledge is that Chick-fil-A practices what it preaches in ways that have nothing to do with politics. Before Christmas 2017, thousands were stranded in Atlanta on a Sunday evening because of a massive power outage. Chick-fil-A, which observes Sunday by closing, quickly reopened to feed travelers. After the shootings at a gay club in Orlando, Pulse, the “gay-hating” franchise opened on a Sunday to feed those waiting in line to give blood. And on a regular basis, it donates a ton of food to the homeless.

But none of this matters to the Bill de Blasios of the world. Indeed, the New York City mayor called for a boycott of Chick-fil-A when it opened in New York in 2016. Ironically, the Christian company that he hates winds up feeding the increasing number of homeless that his policies create.

What is driving the hatred of Chick-fil-A is the fear that its traditional moral values may prove inspiring.

The Left has only one God: power. That is what defines it. To the extent that Chick-fil-A inspires people to adopt its values, it is a threat to radical secularists. Moreover, survey data have repeatedly shown that a very large portion of the “nones,” those who answer “none” when asked about their religious affiliation, are on the Left. They see Christian activists as a threat. Jews are too secular to begin with, and Muslims are too small to matter. So they focus on Christians.

Last year, a survey from Baylor University found that 31 percent of the “nones” identified Christians as a “danger to our safety.” Less than half that number said the same about Muslims. Obviously, there has been no rash of Christians assaulting the “nones,” or anyone else, so the fear is not based in reality. But it is a perfect example of Christophobia, which is spreading like a disease among a large segment of secularists.

What the “nones” need is conversion therapy. This is not about converting them to Christianity, although that would be an ideal outcome, it is about getting them to stop with their irrational fear of Christians. What makes their fear so patently irrational is the fact that Christians, as evidenced by Chick-fil-A, are more likely to help them than hurt them.




MEDIA

The following entries are examples of media duplicity or deception.2013 Annueal Report S

February 13 – 15 
ABC News ran a story about a Catholic official from Purcell Marian High School who was fired for rejecting Catholic teachings on marriage and the family.

In response, a change.org petition campaign was launched attacking the decision. The petition stated, “I would like to respectfully express my disappointment with the Archdiocese of Cincinnati with the decision to fire the Dean of Students at Purcell Marian High School, Mike Moroski, on the grounds that he expressed his belief that gay marriage should be legal.” It went on to call the action by the Archdiocese “an act of tyranny.” The petition collected 7,500 signatures and was delivered to the Archdiocese.

We were upset about this issue for two reasons. First, why is it newsworthy to report on a decision reached by a private, religious institution concerning an employee who violated his contract? Second, since when is it the business of non-Catholics to pressure a Catholic school to reinstate a teacher who rejects the teachings of the Catholic Church?

It is particularly galling for the media to make a big deal about a Catholic school that fires a miscreant employee, especially given the fact that there is no shortage of men and women who have been fired by the media for the filmiest of reasons. Here are a few examples:

• In 2010, Juan Williams was fired from National Public Radio (NPR) because his employer objected to comments he made about Muslims on a television station unaffiliated with NPR.
• In 2012, Pat Buchanan was fired from MSNBC because he wrote a book his employer didn’t like.
• In 2010, Octavia Nasr was fired from CNN because she praised a radical imam on Twitter.
• In 2012, a reporter for the Houston Chronicle was fired for posting on her blog that she was a part-time stripper.
• In 2012, an African American female meteorologist was fired for replying to a racist comment on her Facebook page, even though her comments were inoffensive. The station that fired the black woman for responding to a racist comment was KTBS. It is an ABC affiliate.

July 1
In the week following the murder of a Catholic priest in Syria on June 23, the mainstream media omitted any mention of how Father François Murad was beheaded with a kitchen knife to chants of “Allahu Akbar.” Subsequent reports revealed that he may have been shot and not beheaded. This, too, was ignored by the mainstream media.

December
The media bias was shown in full force by a number of different media outlets reporting on a variety of subjects. The one thing they all had in common was a headline meant to deceive the reader into assuming the worst about Catholicism.

The ABC News headline read, “Gay Catholic School Teacher Fired for Wedding Plans.” Well, not really: he was fired for breaking a contract he voluntarily signed. Michael Griffin, who taught at a Pennsylvania Catholic school, said his principal didn’t care that he was gay, but when he publicly announced his “wedding” plans, he made a conscious decision to flout his contract. So he was canned. Does ABC allow its staff to violate their contracts with impunity?

The USA Today headline read, “Catholic Women Ordained Priest and Deacons in Kentucky.” Well, not really: the old gals were simply playing the game of pretend—dressing up like priests and pretending they were ordained in the Catholic Church. Some in the asylum think they are the pope. Will USA Today do a story on them as well?

The Dayton Daily News headline read, “Ex-Dayton Priest Faces Prosecution.” Well, not really: turns out that the “priest,” Annamalai Annamalai, is a “self-described Hindu high priest.” Readers were intentionally invited to believe he was a Catholic priest. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution was more accurate: it called him a guru.

The CNN headline read, “Catholic College Police Officer Kills Student After Off-Campus Traffic Stop.” Has anyone ever seen a headline that reads, “Jewish College Police Officer Kills Student After Off-Campus Traffic Stop”? Yet CNN used the same words, “Catholic College Police Officer,” in its headline for two different stories. But would CNN ever run a story titled, “Catholic College Police Officer Saves Student Lives”?

Books

April 9
Victor Navasky’s book, The Art of Controversy: Political Cartoons and Their Enduring Power, was published. In it, he lauded the work of Thomas Nast without mentioning the fact that the 19th-century artist consistently inflamed hatred against the Irish and Catholics alike. This was an example of bigotry by omission.

Internet

March 14
In a blog post titled “Child Rape, Inc.” at slog.thestranger.com, Dan Savage addressed news about a lawsuit settlement that involved the release of documents in the Diocese of Joliet. Savage wrote the following:

“Rape a kid making his first confession—holy s**t, that’ll f**ck a kid up for life. And you gotta love how certain the writer is that all of this sexual-abuse-of-children-by-Catholic-priests stuff ended in the 1990s. How can we know for sure? How do you prove that particular negative? And here’s a detail for all you non-Catholics out there: Catholic children make their first first [sic] confession at age seven—and they’re alone with a priest, in dark little box [sic], when they make it. When I was a Catholic kid we went to confession on a weekly basis. So one rapey parish priest could have access to dozens or hundreds of children, completely alone and with no parents present, week-in, week-out, for decades. Access to children alone—that’s built right into this particular sacrament.”

Savage also took a shot at Pope Francis by prefacing his post with the following: “Hate to spoil the new pope’s coming-out party—and it was such a lovely party—but this just in.”

August 14
On July 1, the Catholic League filed a complaint with Facebook about a page that showed an edgy picture of the Virgin Mary with the inscription, “Virgin Mary Should’ve Aborted.” This was the reply: “We reviewed the page you reported for containing hate speech or symbols and found it doesn’t violate our community standard on hate speech.” When others continued to protest, the page was taken down, but then other pages, similar in content, appeared and remained online. The Catholic League responded in a news release calling attention to Facebook’s duplicity in the application of its community standards. In 2012, Facebook censored a French page when a French magazine took liberties with Muhammad.

September 24
Dorothy Samuels, blogging on the New York Times website, termed the just-introduced Marriage and Religious Freedom Act “the latest example of political conservatives trying to use religion as an excuse to discriminate.”

In fact, as San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone pointed out, this was an anti-bias bill, designed to “prevent the federal government from discriminating against religious believers who hold to the principle that marriage is the union of one man and one woman.” Baltimore Archbishop William Lori further explained that the bill would protect against the federal government being “able to deny individuals and organizations a grant, contract, or employment because their belief that marriage is the union of one man and one woman is informed by their religious faith.”

Samuels, however, found it “pernicious” that the government would be prevented from “taking any ‘adverse actions’ based on ‘acts in accordance’ with a person’s or group’s religiously motivated opposition to same sex marriage.”

October 4
In 2008 the Catholic League protested the desecration of a Communion Host by P.Z. Myers, an anti-Catholic atheist professor. In early October, Bill Donohue decided not to protest the antics of Kuma’s Corner, a Chicago restaurant, for serving a burger with a Communion wafer. The difference: Myers secured a consecrated Host and drove a nail through it; the sandwich shop played games with an unconsecrated wafer. While Kuma’s showed disrespect, what Myers did was despicable.

The New Civil Rights Movement, a homosexual outfit, predicted on their website that Donohue would be “stroking out.” They say that what Kuma’s Corner did risked the wrath of “every Christian born without a tolerance gene or a sense of humor.”

October 6
An extremist pro-abortion website, rhrealitycheck.org, led a rash of attacks from left-wing circles against the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. The bishops were exercising their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and freedom of religion to fight for the conscience rights of Catholics against the health care policies of the Obama administration. Specifically, the bishops were seeking to incorporate into a “must-pass” Congressional Continuing Resolution and debt ceiling bill, protection against Catholics being forced by the state to violate their conscience by funding abortion-inducing drugs. Adele Stan led the pack at rhrealitycheck.org with her screed, “At Any Cost: How Catholic Bishops Pushed for a Shutdown—and Even a Default—Over Birth Control.” She was supported by colleague Jessica Mason Pieklo, who said, “Catholic Bishops Meddle With Health-Care Benefits.” Stan was unrestrained in her anti-Catholicism, saying the bishops want to “block access” to “health care for the masses, food for the hungry, and shelter for the homeless.” Also, “they wouldn’t mind seeing the global economy brought to its knees,” and they continue to discriminate against women. Indeed, “no bishop ever endured the pain, blood, and terror of a life-threatening labor.”

October 7
Ian Millhiser titled his thinkprogress.org article, “Catholic Bishops To House: Shut Down the Government Unless We Get Our Way On Birth Control.”

October 8
Joining the left wing attacks against the U.S. Bishops’ stand for religious freedom, blogger Khier Casino’s piece on opposingviews.com, “USCCB Demands Special Rights On Birth Control,” charged that “Seven days before House Republicans shut down the government, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) wrote to House members about forcing the government to shut down –  even a default – unless they were given authority to control what women do in the privacy of their own homes.”

October 8
Dailykos.com, in its story, “Catholic Bishops Demand Congress Abort U.S. Economy,” charged that the U.S. Bishops, because of their effort to protect against being forced to fund abortion-inducing drugs, were demanding “that Congress shut down the federal government and trigger a global economic calamity.”

December 26
The City of Angels Blog, which describes its purpose as “ongoing coverage of pedophile priest crisis in the Catholic Church,” published an entry titled “Pope Mouth on Baby Jesus Thigh Image Turns Pedophile Priest Victims’ Stomachs.” The post objected to an image of Pope Francis kissing a statue of baby Jesus during Christmas mass in the Vatican.  The blogger, Kay Ebeling, described the scene as “the Pope appears to be nibbling on the Baby Jesus’s thigh while the child looks up in ecstasy.”

Magazines

April
The cover of the April issue of the UK magazine Loaded featured the words “For God’s Sake!” and “for men who should know benedict [sic]” together with a photo of a female glamour model scantily covered in a priest’s stole stitched with crosses.

 April 1
The New Yorker ran a Liam Walsh cartoon showing communicants receiving the Eucharist. An altar boy is shown with a pepper mill. The caption reads, “Freshly ground pepper?”

Movies

January 7
On the film website, Awards Daily, an interview with director Alex Gibney focused on his new movie, “Mea Maxima Culpa,” in which he accused then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger of covering up the deeds of Father Lawrence Murphy. Gibney’s attacks went unchallenged by the interviewer. For example, Gibney said, “I got interested in this story for two reasons. One, because it was clear that by following the paper trail of the Milwaukee tale, it would take you to a criminal conspiracy that went right to the top. That is, to say, the Vatican. And not only the Vatican, but the current pope.” The interview engaged in mudslinging; there was never any evidence that Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI was involved in a scandal.

February 4
HBO aired “Mea Maxima Culpa” by director Alex Gibney. The movie engaged in libel by leveling serious and unfounded charges against the pope.

In an interview posted on The Daily Beast, Gibney called the pope “a criminal.” He accused Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger of covering up the deeds of Father Lawrence Murphy, a priest who molested deaf boys in Milwaukee in the 1950s. The New York Times advertised the HBO show by saying there was a “cover-up from rural America to the Vatican.”

The charge that Ratzinger was involved in a cover-up was libelous. The fact of the matter is that no one contacted the civil authorities about Murphy until the mid-1970s (following a probe, the case was dropped), and it wasn’t until 1996 that the Vatican was contacted. Instead of dropping an investigation—the statute of limitations had long expired—the Vatican ordered a trial. Not only was Cardinal Ratzinger not at the trial, his name was never even mentioned. We know this because of the presiding judge’s testimony. Moreover, it wasn’t until 2001 that Pope John Paul II asked Cardinal Ratzinger to police these matters, and when he did, he moved expeditiously and fairly. An honest rendering of these events would conclude that no one at the Vatican has ever taken these cases with greater seriousness than Joseph Ratzinger.

Gibney said he was inspired to do the film after reading an article by Laurie Goodstein in the New York Times. Gibney referred to Goodstein’s reporting in which she said that “Vatican delegates” were aware of Murphy’s abuse “as early as 1958.” In fact, this false claim did not appear in Goodstein’s reporting and was repeated by the film.

September 27
“Don Jon,” a film that premiered earlier in the year at the Sundance Film Festival, opened in theatres across the United States. The film’s protagonist, portrayed by Joseph Gordon-Levitt who also wrote the screenplay and directed the movie, is a sex addicted man who spends his time looking at pornography on the internet or cruising bars for one night stands.

The film also focuses on the man’s faith and depicts him as a church going Catholic. However, the biggest swipe comes at the movie’s portrayal of the Sacrament of Reconciliation. The man goes to Confession weekly and boasts about his sexual exploits. The priest gives him no impetus to change and assigns him little more than a token penance.

The message of overcoming lust to find love could, on its own, present a respectable story, but the anti-Catholic bias is so deeply ingrained that the film is more about making the Church appear hypocritical than anything else.

Movie critic David Edelstein, writing in New York Magazine, was delighted that Gordon-Levitt is “brilliantly subversive on Catholicism.” “In Don Jon, religion doesn’t simply allow you to function with your eyes and heart closed” (its normal purpose, apparently, in Edelstein’s view). “It benefits from tunnel vision. It’s another form of masturbation.”

November 22
The film “Philomena” opened in movie theaters across the United States. This movie tells the story of an Irish woman who gave birth to a son out-of-wedlock a half-century ago, and gave him up for adoption; he was born in an abbey, a venue that allowed the mother to avoid being stigmatized.

There is nothing particularly startling about this, other than the fact that film reviewers were suddently aghast about the “horrors” these fallen women experienced; many are making reference to the Magdalene Laundries. As Bill Donohue had detailed earlier in the year, it’s bunk. Those who were neither scholars nor principled observers have swallowed this propaganda, so debased is their appetite for anti-Catholic fare.

However, there was one reviewer who was exceptionally fair, Kyle Smith of the New York Post. He is worth quoting at length:

“The film doesn’t mention that in 1952 Ireland, both mother and child’s life would have been utterly ruined by an out-of-wedlock birth and that the nuns are actually giving both a chance at a fresh start and that both, indeed, in real life, enjoyed. No, this is a diabolical-Catholic film, straight up.”

Kyle Smith’s closing remark says it all, “A film that is half as harsh on Judaism or Islam, of course, wouldn’t be made in the first place, and would be universally reviled if it were. ‘Philomena’ is a sucker punch, or maybe a sugary slice of arsenic cake.”

Music

May 8
David Bowie released the music video for his song, “The Next Day.” In the video, one priest bashes a homeless man, while others are busy hitting on women. Self-flagellation is depicted. A dancing woman with bleeding hands makes a stigmata statement. A customer is served eyeballs on a plate. The lyrics refer to the “priest stiff in hate” and “women dressed as men for the pleasure of that priest.” The song concludes with, “They can work with Satan while they dress with the saints.”

October 18
Kanye West kicked off his “Yeezus” tour in Seattle. On the opening night of his new tour, a tall Jesus character appeared on stage prior to West’s “Jesus Walks” number. “White Jesus, is that you?…Oh, s***,” West said. Nothing that the Jesus figure said was irresponsible, but West could not stop there. His performance also included a Virgin Mary, incense, a crucifix, etc., all trotted out to make a Catholic statement. That it was not exactly reverential is obvious.

Newspapers

January 9
The New York Times website’s “Room for Debate” section of its “Opinion Pages” featured the following question: “With Children, When Does Religion Go Too Far?” Commentators were invited to respond.

This was not just an attack on all religions; the Times‘ history of Catholic bashing made it clear that the question was meant for Catholics, in particular. The bias at the Times is such that it would never invite commentators to discuss when secularism goes too far.

January 14
In a piece that appeared in the Beirut newspaper, The Daily Star, Ian Buruma began by recounting the brutal rape of a young woman by six men on a New Delhi bus in December of 2012. He then segued to Pope Benedict XVI’s speech on gay marriage, which was given a few days before Christmas, in order to say that the pope was responsible for the gang rape. Buruma said that, even though the pope does not advocate violence against homosexuals, “I would argue that his speech [the pope’s] actually encourages the kind of sexual aggression that can result in the savagery that took place in New Delhi.”

Ian Buruma is a Henry R. Luce Professor of Democracy, Human Rights, and Journalism at Bard College and has won several awards from prestigious institutions in the U.S. and Europe.

January 24
The weekly Miami Sun Post published a free-association opinion column on the news of the day which included a paragraph about the Vatican ordering new sets of armor for the Swiss Guard. The following anti-Catholic comment was made: “Who else but a stuffy old church hierarchy, immersed in antiquated dogma and outdated rules, would still have a need for medieval armor? A Vatican woefully out of step with today’s world would do better to instead order straitjackets for the pope, the College of Cardinals, and the whole kit-and-caboodle bureaucracy that buttresses these old farts.”

February 5
The Hark blog of the Denver Post published an article titled “U.S. bishops’ attempts to demonize Obama and claim martyrdom worse than ridiculous” by Terence R. Kelly, an author with a history of engaging in anti-Catholic rants. Among other things, he wrote that “the key moral story of the 2012 elections is the Catholic bishops’ collective, shameful and toxic immorality.” He concluded his article by accusing the U.S. bishops of hate speech.

February 5
Editorials in the Newark Star-Ledger and The Record (Bergen County) concerned the appointment by Newark Archbishop John J. Myers of Rev. Michael Fugee as co-director of the Office of Continuing Education and Ongoing Formation of Priests (a post he assumed in October 2012).

In 2001, Father Fugee was charged with groping a teenager while wrestling. He initially said he touched the boy’s crotch, but later recanted. He was initially found guilty, but later had the verdict thrown out by an appellate panel of judges. He was subsequently investigated by the archdiocesan review board and was also cleared of wrongdoing. Over the past 12 years, there had been no allegations against him.

The Star-Ledger said that Father Fugee’s promotions “insult all victims of clergy abuse.” Similarly, The Record said the priest “should not be in active ministry.” This was an attack on the autonomy of the Church by outsiders who took it upon themselves to instruct Archbishop Myers on how to interpret the meaning of a charter drawn up by the bishops to handle these matters. Furthermore, the implication that a priest cleared of any charges of wrongdoing was nevertheless guilty was an attack on the civil liberties of priests.

At the end of 2013 Father Fugee was in the process of petitioning the Vatican for his removal from the priesthood.

February 7
The New York Times published an op-ed piece about a homosexual priest who molested someone. He died after being suspended from ministry in the 1990s. The article was accompanied by an illustration depicting a priest resembling a creature from Hell. The article was gratuitous and had no bearing on the current situation; there is almost no abuse being committed by priests in the U.S. today. When reports surface, in almost every instance they are about old cases. The Times‘ fishing for stories that happened decades ago showed a clear agenda.

February 20
The media coverage of priests accused of wrongdoing has long been skewed and there are plenty of examples of the media’s relentless coverage of priests with little or no attention paid to clergy of other faiths. The following example shines as bright a light on this problem as one can imagine.

The New York Times ran two stories on a Bridgeport, CT priest who was arrested, Msgr. Kevin Wallin, one of the stories was on the cover.  Meanwhile, two New York rabbis were arrested, each meriting one story in the Times: Rabbi Yoel Malik was arrested on January 31, and Rabbi Nathan David Rabinowich was arrested on February 14.

Msgr. Wallin was arrested for a drug related charge. Rabbi Malik was arrested for sexually abusing three teenage boys. He was charged with 12 counts of sexual abuse, 4 counts of criminal sexual contact, 11 counts of endangering the welfare of a child, and a single charge of forcible touching. Rabbi Rabinowich was charged with four sexual offenses, including the attempted rape of a 14-year-old girl.

The total number of words in the Times story on the priest was 3496 (the  front-page story merited 2745 words). The total number of words on the two rabbis combined was 828 (the stories appeared on pages 22 and 25, respectively).

It was not just the Times that gave rabbis a pass: the New York Daily News had two stories on Malik (only mentioning him by name in one!); the New York Post ran one story on him; the Daily News ran one story on Rabinowich; and the Post had none. (Only the print editions were counted.)

Wallin had multiple problems (he was a cross-dressing drug addict and, like Malik, he was a practicing homosexual). But he was not a child rapist. So why the heightened interest in him, and the relative disinterest in the rabbis? The disparity of treatment was an indication of anti-Catholic bias.

Furthermore, Malik’s arrest came less than two weeks after another member of his ultra-Orthodox Jewish group, an unlicensed therapist, was sentenced to 103 years in prison for sexually abusing a young woman from the time she was 12. Additionally, a rabbi who publicly criticized this rapist had a cup of bleach thrown at him, burning his eyes and face. It never made the front page of any newspaper.

February 24
During the Oscars, The Onion, a satirical publication, made an obscene comment on its Twitter account about Quvenzhané Wallis. It referred to the 9-year-old girl as a “c***.” After fielding a deluge of complaints, an apology was granted. The writer of the tweet said his remarks were “crude and offensive.” He added, “No person should be subjected to such a senseless, humorless comment masquerading as satire.” Steve Hannah, CEO of The Onion, said “we are taking immediate steps to discipline those individuals responsible.” He closed by saying, “Miss Wallis, you are young and talented and deserve better. All of us at The Onion are deeply sorry.”

The apology underscored the fact that The Onion has no standards regarding “crude and offensive” work when it comes to Catholics. Nor does it discipline those who make vulgar comments about Catholicism.

On December 13, 2012, The Onion printed a vile piece about the pope. The article said the pope gave permission to make a porn flick at the Vatican. The film crew had to “install glory holes in the confessional booth” (they are used by homosexuals for fellatio). “This place has some f***ing beautiful art and s***. And it’s only going to look better dripping with hot jizz.”

The movie was said to feature “masturbation, blow jobs, girl-on-girl action, strap-on crucifixes, cum shots, triple-anal penetration, semen swapping, papalingus, bondage, and a gang-bang scene titled, ‘Immaculate Erection,’ which features several archbishops and the Virgin Mary.”

April 28
On April 28, an editorial in the Newark Star-Ledger called on Newark Archbishop John J. Myers to resign. The occasion of the editorial was the alleged failure of the Newark Archdiocese to police Father Michael Fugee. In 2001, he was charged with groping a teenager while wrestling. After initially being found guilty, the verdict was overthrown by an appellate panel of judges. Fugee agreed to certain conditions, which the newspaper said had been violated. The Star-Ledger wanted Archbishop Myers to resign because he allegedly did not hold Fugee to the terms of the agreement. This accusation was patently false.

The court agreement expressly allowed Father Fugee to have contact with minors, provided he was supervised. Nothing in either the news story or the editorial even suggested that Fugee was at any time unsupervised in his contacts with minors. If the Star-Ledger had such evidence, it would have said so.

Accompanying the editorial was a front-page story on Father Fugee. The Sunday article, which ran over 2,000 words, recounted various aspects of this issue. It did not mention, however, that in addition to being cleared by the civil courts, the archdiocesan review board cleared Fugee of any wrongdoing. Nor did it mention that the case was sent to Rome for review; no charges were brought against him. In other words, Fugee’s case was thrice thrown out. Also, the newspaper failed to mention that there has not been one allegation made against this priest in the past 12 years.

At bottom, the Star-Ledger unfairly maligned Archbishop Myers, and treated Father Fugee like a political football. If Myers strapped a GPS tracking device on Fugee’s body, it wouldn’t have satisfied the newspaper’s craving for punitive action.

The accusations that Father Fugee broke the terms of his court agreement forbidding unsupervised contact with minors were reviewed by the Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office and no charges were filed. In November Father Fugee reached a new agreement with the Archdiocese of Newark and the Prosecutor’s Office that he would petition Rome for laicization from the priesthood.

May 9
The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops released the 2012 Annual Report on priestly sexual abuse. Not a single secular newspaper in the United States reported on it. This was an example of bias by omission. What was omitted was good news: The fewest allegations and victims were reported since data collection for the annual reports began in 2004.

May 15
The Philadelphia Inquirer turned down a statement written by Bill Donohue that called attention to an egregious miscarriage of justice involving three Catholic priests and one Catholic layman. The Catholic League was told that the decision was made by those “at the top.”

The editorial was submitted to the newspaper as a two-page ad scheduled to run on May 20. The rejection came after the League pledged to pay the newspaper $58,000 for the ad, not an insignificant sum for a paper that filed for bankruptcy in 2009.

The Inquirer’s rejection suggested that those “at the top” would rather forego the money before ever disseminating a defense about the way three Catholic priests, and one Catholic layman, were treated in court. Indeed, one of the reasons why these Catholic men were treated so unjustly is the failure of the Philadelphia media, led by the Inquirer, to raise serious questions about what happened.

Although the Catholic League was turned down without explanation, this did not stop the truth from getting disseminated. On May 20, the League sent the statement to over 900 members of the media in Philadelphia and Harrisburg and blanketed the parishes in Philadelphia. The Catholic League also went national with this story.

May 15
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran a Rob Rogers cartoon attacking Bishop David Zubik of Pittsburgh for speaking out against the “naked pope” stunt at Carnegie Mellon University. Bishop Zubik is portrayed as intolerant for exercising his First Amendment right to free speech. In addition, he is compared to an imam demanding the institution of Sharia law. The Catholic Church is smeared in its entirety as lax in policing “pedophile scandals.” In the last panel, the Church is portrayed as intolerant.

May 30
The Catholic League released Bill Donohue’s booklet, Myths of the Magdalene Laundries. It debunked the conventional wisdom about these Catholic-run facilities in Ireland. Based on the McAleese Report, the Irish government study that was released in February, the booklet examined the origins of the many myths that have surfaced about the laundries.

Virtually all the horror stories that the public was told—nuns cruelly torturing and sexually abusing “fallen” women—were lies. Worse, Irish officials, such as the current prime minister, Enda Kenny, continued to misinform the public, even in the face of indisputable evidence.

Media outlets, the BBC and major newspapers such as the New York Times, in particular, refused to discuss the McAleese Report, leaving the impression that the falsehoods told by Peter Mullan in his propaganda film, “The Magdalene Sisters,” offers an accurate picture of what happened. Thus, this was a clear instance of bigotry by omission.

Copies of the booklet were widely distributed to the media, Irish historical societies, Irish fraternal and sororal groups, the clergy—including all the bishops—and those who made a donation to the Catholic League to cover the costs of publishing and distributing the booklet.

Bill Donohue commented: “Fair criticism of the Magdalene Laundries, or any other Catholic institution, is not only acceptable, it is welcome. That’s the only way progress can be made. But agit-prop films, and agenda-driven activists and writers, must be challenged. The truth is we’ve been lied to about the Magdalene Laundries, and it’s time to set the record straight.”

June 11 – June 17
The U.S. Ambassador to Belgium, Howard Gutman, was accused of soliciting prostitutes and minor children. In particular,  Gutman “routinely ditched his protective security detail in order to solicit sexual favors from both prostitutes and minor children.” (Italics added.) This charge was largely omitted by the major newspapers and highlighted a double standard with respect to the reporting of the sexual abuse of minors: current allegations of child rape by government officials were far less interesting to the media than decades-old stories about priests. While no newspaper was more outraged over minors being molested by priests than the Boston Globe, it did not run a single piece on this story. The New York Times ran one story; the Washington Post ran one story, but unlike the Times, it never mentioned “minor children”; the Los Angeles Times, like the Globe, ignored the story altogether. The scope of the omission was evidence of a veiled anti-Catholic animus.

June 28
The cover of the Summer Guide 2013 issue of the Santa Fe Reporter featured a parody of Our Lady of Guadalupe. The Virgin Mary was shown in a bikini and sunglasses sipping on a cocktail. The magazine issued an apology after the Catholic League demanded one to the publication’s Catholic readers in a letter to the editor.

July 2
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reacted to the public disclosure of Cardinal Timothy Dolan’s deposition regarding his tenure as the Milwaukee Archbishop by featuring the pictures of 45 priests who at one time or another had substantiated allegations made against them. Yet this was hardly news since it was Archbishop Dolan who had posted the names of the priests in 2004. Furthermore, many of the bishops in the Catholic Church have made public the names of suspected sexual offenders. By contrast, there is not a single institution, secular or religious, that has done likewise. The Sentinel said the following about the bishops’ conference 2002 charter that addresses the sexual abuse of minors: “How effective that charter has been is a matter of some debate.” In fact, the success of the charter was beyond debate: In the past six years, the average number of credible allegations made against over 40,000 priests was exactly 7. By falsely portraying Cardinal Dolan as someone who created the problem and not someone who fixed it, the Sentinel showed its bias against the Catholic Church.

July 9
The Plain Dealer ran a Jeff Darcy cartoon mocking the news that Pope John Paul II was cleared for sainthood. The cartoon was accompanied by an essay in which the cartoonist said, “The miracles I associate with Pope John Paul II, are the miracles of all those children surviving after being abused by priests the Vatican enabled and sheltered. They are the real saints.”  The cartoon showed one panel in which Pope John Paul II was shown under the words, “Declared Saint.” He is shown wearing two medals: one said “Fall of USSR,” the other said “Global Outreach.” In an adjacent panel a flock of sheep are shown under the words “Undeclared Saints.” The sheep are labeled, “Kids molested on his watch.”

July 25
A poll was taken on the website of USA Today asking respondents to choose which video they liked best: the one where David Letterman compared all priests to molesters, or the one where Jay Leno said Pope Francis could be mistaken for Lady Gaga.  While Leno’s jab was inoffensive, Letterman’s July 23 monologue was vile. His “altar boy” quip—World Youth Day is called by the Vatican “salute to altar boys”—was a vicious hit on 40,000 innocent priests.

USA Today took Letterman’s offensive remarks to a new level. It not only flagged his bigotry, it celebrated it. Many more respondents preferred Letterman’s obscene statement to Leno’s throw-away line.

August 3
The Newark Star-Ledger ran a Drew Sheneman cartoon that mocked Pope Francis for his comments on homosexual priests. Under a caricature of the pope, the caption read, “If someone’s gay, who am I to judge? Don’t get me wrong, according to divine law you’re still going to burn for all eternity, but on a personal level, we’re cool.”

August 23
The movie, “Paradise: Faith,” opened in New York and Los Angeles. The New York Times found it “riveting.” In the movie, a “devout” Catholic woman masturbates with a crucifix, flagellates herself, walks around the house praying on her knees, goes door-to-door with a statue of the Virgin Mary, and fights off her paraplegic Muslim husband who tries to rape her.

August 30
The weekly Orange County, California news publication OC Weekly attacked Bishop Kevin Vann of the Diocese of Orange. The article titled “Orange Diocese Bishop Kevin Vann Doing His Damndest to Stop CA Bill that Would Help Child-Abuse Victims” attacked Bishop Vann for his opposition to SB 131, a deeply flawed bill that would target the Catholic Church with millions of dollars in lawsuits, but provide no relief to abuse victims of public schools. OC Weekly summarized Bishop Vann’s opposition in the following way: “Yeah, we let pedo-priests rape children, then covered it up. But NOW you should really, really trust us!” The OC Weekly article also attacked Bishop Vann’s diocesan newspaper, calling it a “rag” and said that it publishes “gobbledygook.”

October 10
The National Catholic Reporter gave top billing – the lead story on the home page of its website – to Adele Stan’s vicious attack on the U.S. Bishops, blaming them for the government shutdown and accusing them of wanting to “block access” to “health care for the masses, food for the hungry, and shelter for the homeless.” In the piece, titled, “At Any Cost: How Catholic Bishops Pushed for a Shutdown – and Even a Default – Over Birth Control,” she charged that “they wouldn’t mind seeing the global economy brought to its knees,” adding that not only do the bishops discriminate against women, “no bishop ever endured the pain, blood, and terror of a life-threatening labor.” That Stan’s article was first published on a pro-abortion and anti-Catholic website, rhrealitycheck.org, did not deter NCR editor Dennis Coday from prominently headlining it.

Radio

July 8
On “Imus in the Morning,” actor Rob Bartlett is a regular on the show who plays a character called “Don Corleone, The Godfather” and imitates Brando. Bartlett did a piece titled “Pope John Paul’s Sainthood.” Bartlett said the following: “John Paul II, rest in peace, has been beatified, which is the next to the last step before becoming a saint. He has still to make his bones; not the same way as someone would in my business. The Vatican requires he perform two miracles…One of Pope John Paul’s miracles was to cure a nun of Parkinson’s disease. Personally I would have settled for his being able to (speaks in mock Italian and then translates) get the priests to keep their paws off the altar boys…”

August 23
When the new film, “Paradise: Faith,” opened in New York and Los Angeles, NPR declared the movie “recommended.” In the movie, a “devout” Catholic woman masturbates with a crucifix, flagellates herself, walks around the house praying on her knees, goes door-to-door with a statue of the Virgin Mary, and fights off her paraplegic Muslim husband who tries to rape her.

October 31
On “Imus in the Morning” the topic of the National Security Administration spying on the Vatican was brought up. Don Imus repeatedly stated that spying on the Vatican was a good idea because priests are child molesters.

Imus: “Well they got a whole mafia going on at the Vatican, and a bunch of guys glomming onto the kids, not the pope, but they got some icky stuff going on at the Vatican.”

Imus: “Not a bad idea considering what’s going on there. Them glomming on the kids, that whole mafia deal […] a bunch of sick dudes there […] which is why the pope, God bless him, he’s over there at the Motel 6 …”

Imus: “Well we know what’s going on at the Vatican, you’re not denying that are you, I would hope? The funny business going on at the Vatican which is why the Pope…  (co-hosts interject that the pope has cleaned up the Vatican and its “all good”)  It’s not all good, they’re still covering up for these priests glomming on to the kids and Cardinals covering up for that. And in some cases the Cardinals glomming onto the kids.”

November 20
On the “Dennis & Callahan Morning Show” on WEEI radio in the Boston area and simulcast on the New England Sports Network, sports talk show hosts John Dennis, Gerry Callahan and Kirk Minihane attacked the pope’s compassion for a man severely disfigured by disease. Minihane remarked that Pope Francis was “making out” with the man.  Insulting the pope’s mercy was not enough for them. They said that the pope belongs in the mall with Santa, and implied that he molests children.

Callahan: “Have a pope at every mall? … Have all the little boys sit on his lap?”
Minihane: “Yeah, that might be an issue.”

December 9
WEEI (Boston, MA) sports radio talk show hosts Kirk Minihane and Gerry Callahan compared the Blessed Mother to a pregnant television star on the “Dennis & Callahan Morning Show,” which is simulcast on the New England Sports Network.  During a segment about recent headlines, Minihane and Callahan discuss the announcement that Evelyn Lozada is six months pregnant with her second child. Lozada is a star of “Basketball Wives” and is known for having relationships with several professional athletes.

Minihane: “So Evelyn Lozada, she’s pregnant, I know it’s hard to believe much like the Virgin Mary, sometimes there’s a…”
Callahan: “Here I thought she kept her knees together.”
Minihane: “Well, it happened again, only the second coming of the baby Jesus.”

December 11
The “Dennis & Callahan Morning Show” on WEEI radio used the selection of Pope Francis as Time magazine’s “Person of the Year” as an opportunity to spread lies and insults about the Holy Father. Discussing the selection of the pope, host Kirk Minihane says that Pope Francis hates religious people. Co-host Gerry Callahan responds “Now that they know he’s pro-choice and he’s pro-gay marriage and he doesn’t go to church, and he doesn’t wear that, like weird funny hat – they love him. This is the mainstream media’s favorite religious figure, like ever.” Minihane responds “he’s bisexual, he’s going to start dating a woman.”

Television

January 10
On his MSNBC show, Lawrence O’Donnell attacked Atlanta Pastor Louie Giglio for accepting Biblical teachings on the sinfulness of homosexuality. In the 1990s, Giglio addressed this subject and cited Christian teachings. Giglio bowed to pressure from homosexual activists by agreeing not to give the benediction at President Obama’s inauguration. For O’Donnell, the problem was the Bible itself. He readily admitted that the Bible condemned homosexuality, but falsely claimed that the Bible condemns “gay people.” He neglected to draw the distinction between behavior and status. He said the practice of presidents putting their hand on the Bible is “one of our most absurdist [sic] traditions.” He said that because Obama embraces the gay agenda, he should not swear on the Bible.

February 11
ABC’s “World News” broadcast on the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI demonstrated anti-Catholic bias. The following comments were made:

• In an interview with New York’s Cardinal Timothy Dolan, reporter Diane Sawyer asked if the “burden of what the Church has been through with the scandals” caused the Pope’s resignation—with no basis in fact.
• During the same interview, Sawyer said, “There has to be fundamental change” to the Church’s positions on social issues.
• Posing as a papal historian, Jeffrey Kofman declared that the Pope’s “papacy will be remembered for its scandals.” This supposed authority on the Catholic Church then said that Benedict had “tried to hold back the forces of modernity.”
• ABC correspondent Cecilia Vega, according to Sawyer, “spent the day gathering American reaction from all over,” but then delivered reaction only from liberal Catholics who pushed ABC’s liberal narrative that the Church must “modernize.”
• ABC did not name one single accomplishment of Benedict XVI.

February 16
“Saturday Night Live” aired the skit, “Djesus Uncrossed,” a take-off of “Django Unchained,” a violent film that had caused much controversy. The SNL segment was itself uncharacteristically bloody; there was also a snide remark by the announcer saying the skit was less violent than “The Passion of the Christ.”

In early March, both Sears and JCPenney indicated that they had pulled their advertising from “Saturday Night Live” as a result of this incident. Sears removed all its advertising from running during “Saturday Night Live.” JCPenney did not advertise during the following episode of “Saturday Night Live,” and removed its commercials from online rebroadcasts of that episode. NBC removed the offensive clip from its online video shortly thereafter.

February 26
On the NBC hidden camera show, “Betty White’s Off Their Rockers” an older woman impersonating a nun in habit stopped a young man on the street and informed him that she was thinking of getting breast implants. She asks his opinion on whether she should go up one size or two. The “nun” also asks the young man if he is a “boob man” to which he replied “I’m more of an a** guy.”  The “nun” concludes by telling the man “I have a date with a really hot priest. You know what I mean? He’s kind of young. I’m so excited.”

March 10
Appearing on MSNBC’s “The Chris Matthews Show” guest Andrew Sullivan was asked if a change in opinion among Catholics on the topic of same sex marriage might impact the selection of the new pope. Sullivan responded that “there are many gays electing the next pope.” When Matthews asked him to clarify if he meant the Cardinals, Sullivan responded “Yes.”

March 26
On the Comedy Central program “Tosh.0” host Daniel Tosh showed a video of two men blowing cigarette smoke into each other’s faces. One man opens his mouth and “eats” the smoke. Tosh responds with a sexual joke, “this means we have a new pope, and he’s a swallower.” The episode was re-aired on December 17.

March 27
During his opening monologue on “The Tonight Show With Jay Leno,” host Jay Leno claimed Pope Francis said the use of condoms is acceptable in certain circumstances: “We’re learning more and more about this new pope, Pope Francis. A very gracious man, unlike many in the Catholic Church leadership, he says the use of condoms is acceptable in certain cases. That’s what he said. He said condoms are acceptable in certain cases. But not those glow in the dark condoms. No, those are out, doesn’t like those at all, just forget those. Leave that for the next guy.”

April 12
Starz featured what one critic described as a “fact-fiction-mash-up” series entitled “Da Vinci’s Demons” about Leonardo da Vinci. The series featured gruesome instances of brutality including hangings and beheadings. In one scene, Pope Sixtus IV was shown in a sexual embrace with a boy in a pool while holding a knife against the boy’s throat. A count enters the scene to share secret information with the pope, after which the pope kills the boy.

Even before the series premiered, the scene was recognized as anti-Catholic. One reviewer stated that this scene was “bound to be attacked by some within the Catholic Church.” Another reviewer said, “The demons, at least in this world, are the leaders of the Roman Catholic Church.” Another reviewer wrote that “It’s the pope…who is burdened with playing the vicious gay stereotype here, preying like a crocodile on young men who have the misfortune of taking a dip in his vast Vatican hot tub.”

April 19
“The 700 Club” featured a segment titled “God and Hitler,” in which Gordon Robertson (son of Rev. Pat Robertson), hosted a discussion on the Catholic Church’s response to Hitler. The errors were many, serious, and indefensible:

• It was wrong to paint Hitler as a Catholic. Though he was baptized, he excommunicated himself, latae sententiae, when he sought, in his words, to “crush [the Catholic Church] like a toad.” He made good on his pledge by persecuting 8,000 priests, over 500 of whom were killed in concentration camps. He also sought to assassinate the pope.
• The 1933 Nazi-Vatican Concordat was not a show of solidarity. As Rabbi David Dalin has shown, it was a protective measure designed to protect German Catholics from persecution. In fact, at least 34 letters of protest were sent from the Vatican to the Nazis between 1933 and 1937, culminating in a 1937 encyclical that condemned Nazi violations of the Concordat and Nazi racial ideology. It was smuggled out of Italy and distributed on Palm Sunday to Catholics in Germany. Nothing like this happened in Protestant churches in Germany.
• It was not true that Hitler met resistance from Protestants alone. Former Israeli Diplomat Pinchas Lapide estimated that the Catholic Church, under the auspices of Pope Pius XII, saved as many as 860,000 Jewish lives. During the war, the New York Times twice said the Church was “a lonely voice crying out of the silence of a continent”; Albert Einstein also singled out the Church during the war. After the war, Golda Meir praised the work of the Church, as did the ADL, the World Jewish Congress, and scores of other Jewish organizations.
• It was factually wrong to say the Vatican archives have “never been seen.” Many scholars have had access.

As for Pope Pius XII being “Hitler’s Pope,” it must be noted that John Cornwell, the ex-seminarian who originated this term, retracted it years ago. Yet, “The 700 Club” continued to cite it.

May 3
On “The Late Show with Craig Ferguson,” the following exchange occurred between host Craig Ferguson and English comedian Simon Amstell:

Amstell: “The trouble with the pope…you can’t kill him, can you? Because…”
Ferguson: “No, no, you can’t! No! No, no, no, no you can’t! No, not just the pope. Anyone at all! You’re not allowed to kill anyone!”
Amstell: “No. But, even like, with the pope, it is especially pointless with the pope, because he, you know, they just replace him with a new one.”

 May 7
On “Conan,” host Conan O’Brien said the following in his opening monologue: “I don’t know if you heard this story. A Catholic bishop from Massachusetts was arrested for drunk driving. Yeah, still it was a relief to find a Catholic official get in trouble for only having a beer on his lap.”

May 22
NBC’s “Law and Order: Special Victims Unit” episode entitled “Her Negotiation” featured a suspect who is arrested for exposing himself and taken to the police station. Once there it is revealed that he said “get down on your knees, open your mouth and take Communion” while attempting to pressure two women to engage him in oral sex.

June 10
On “The Colbert Report,” host Stephen Colbert had Dan Savage on as a guest to promote his new book. After discussing homosexual marriage, they talked about ObamaCare. Savage mentioned the single-payer model of health insurance. The following exchange occurred:

Savage: “You know who has the single-payer  model? Vatican City.”
Colbert: “This is it right here.” [Makes the sign of the cross away from himself in the manner of a priest.]
Savage: “It covers everything but birth control because altar boys can’t get pregnant. When altar boys start getting pregnant, they’ll cover birth control, too.”
Colbert: “We’re going to gloss over that for a moment.”
Savage: “As the Catholic Church has done for decades.”

June 13
On a segment of “The Daily Show” with Jon Stewart called “Gaywatch,” anchor John Oliver focused on Pope Francis’ alleged “gay lobby” remarks.

John Oliver: “Gays are coming under attack in France and Russia, but there is one place apparently where they have found a home.”

Switch to female reporter speaking: “A stunning revelation coming from the head of the Catholic Church. Pope Francis says there is a gay lobby in the Vatican.”

John Oliver: “I don’t know if I would call a Vatican gay lobby a stunning revelation, really. The whole building is basically a Liberace fever dream, unless you don’t mean an architectural lobby.”

Switch to clip of Fr. Edward Beck speaking: “‘Gay lobby’ is kind of a confusing term. I think we use lobby to mean somebody setting forth a certain agenda.”

John Oliver: “I’m sorry, I wasn’t listening to a word that man was saying, because I was lost in his eyes. Look at them, so piercing blue, and his hair, so snowy white. It’s as if Anderson Cooper and a Siberian Husky made love and had a baby priest. I want one of those. I want one of those. I’m sorry, Father McDreamy, you were saying that lobby is not a good word for it.”

Switch to clip of Fr. Edward Beck speaking: “Probably a better word would be ‘gay cabal,’ ‘gay clique.”

John Oliver: “Right, and other nouns include a gay lunch, air, man pile, a cabin crew, an Oscar party or a Palm Springs traffic jam. If there is a gay lobby, what is it they want? How much damage could they do?”

Switch to female reporter speaking: “So there have been big rumors here that the gay lobby drove Benedict from the Catholic Church.”

John Oliver: “That is just ridiculous. A gay lobby did not drive Pope Benedict from the Church, because if they did it would have looked like this:”

[Switch to clip of a silver bus with silver ribbons streaming, with Pope Benedict’s head imposed on the body of a woman in a silver dress, singing opera.]

John Oliver: “You’ve got to admit, that would have been one hell of an exit. The bottom line to all of this is no matter what country you live in, what religion you belong to, it seems crazy that in this day and age anyone has a problem with which gender you want to, um, what’s the phrase?”

[Switch to clip of Pat Robertson saying the words “want to do sex with each other.”]

June 22
On an episode of E! Entertainment Television’s  “Fashion Police”, host Joan Rivers made an offensive comment about Catholic priests. Rivers compared actress Laura Linney’s outfit to a girl’s Catholic school uniform: “She looks like a Catholic school girl. And now I suddenly understand why priests resorted to boys.”

June 24
On NBC’s “Days of Our Lives” a woman drugged and raped a priest in order to get revenge against the priest’s mother. The sexual encounter is videotaped and later shown during a wedding that the priest was presiding at.

July
Showtime’s new drama “Ray Donovan” was breaking records by its second episode. The show is about a Boston man, Ray Donovan, who “fixes” problems for the rich and famous. The show includes Donovan’s father who is released from jail and then immediately murders a priest, as well as a plotline about Donovan’s brother Bunchy, a drug addict, alcoholic and sexual anorexic. Bunchy stands to win millions in a settlement with the Archdiocese of Boston because he was sexually abused by a Catholic priest as a young boy.

July 18
The Academy of Television Arts and Sciences announced the 65th Primetime Emmy Awards nominations. “American Horror Story: Asylum,” the anti-Catholic show on the FX Channel, lead the pack with 17 Emmy nominations. The show depicted a Catholic home for the criminally insane run by sadistic and libidinous nuns. The plot was sinister. Characters included a nymphomaniac, a lesbian, a degenerate bully, a serial killer, and a doctor who enjoys torturing patients.

July 23
On  “The Late Show with David Letterman,” host David Letterman commented on Pope Francis’ appearance at World Youth Day and said the following: “And I’m telling you if there’s anything the kids can’t get enough of, it’s a 76-year-old virgin. Come on! World Youth Day. Or as the Vatican calls it, salute to altar boys.” It was also noteworthy that this line did not go over well with his audience.

July 29
During the opening monologue of the “Late Show with David Letterman,” host David Letterman showed a mock video of the bishops in Brazil reacting enthusiastically to Pope Francis’ remarks concerning gay priests, inferring the bishops are gay. Letterman said the following: “So Pope Francis goes to South America. He’s down there in Brazil and he announced that he would not – he says, ‘I don’t care, I would not judge anyone who is gay.’ That’s what Pope Francis said. That must have been some trip to Rio. But I’ve got to tell you, when the pope said he would not judge gay priests, the bishops went absolutely crazy. They loved it. Here, watch.” Footage was then shown of the bishops in Brazil waving their arms and singing. The caption read, “BISHOPS REACT TO POPE FRANCIS DECREE ON HOMOSEXUALITY.” The video was accompanied by the song, “It’s Raining Men,” the lyrics of which were, “It’s raining men, Hallelujah, It’s raining men, I’m gonna go out, I’m gonna let myself, get absolutely soaking wet.”

August 1
In the opening monologue of “Conan,” host Conan O’Brien made light fun of the Sacraments of Reconciliation and Baptism. The monologue included a one-liner subtitle about children being molested by priests: “Kids can opt out of fondling by texting #nothanks to the Vatican.” This was a blatant attempt to smear all priests as molesters.

August 6
The new Comedy Central show, “The Jeselnik Offensive” featured  a “Worst Best Thing of the Week” with host Anthony Jeselnik, Dave Attell and Joan Rivers. The following exchange occurred:

Jeselnik: “Finally, the Vatican is giving gay priests the same respect they show pedophiles.”
Rivers: “The pope, surprise, is the gayest. The man wears a dress, lives with all guys, you know.”
Attell: “And the cool thing about it is I’m a Jew and I could really care less about the whole thing. I mean, you know, an Easter egg hunt is an Easter egg. If it ends in an ass, it doesn’t matter to me. I don’t care.”
Rivers: “He’s bringing the church into the 21st century, and let’s be happy about that. I mean, ass-less altar boy costumes….We all have to kiss the pope’s ring. I love it now because he likes gays, and he says, fine now—lower, lower, lower, and, uh, don’t forget the balls.”

September 6
On “CBS This Morning,” host Mark Phillips discussed Pope Francis’ prayers against military action, and in favor of peace in Syria. Phillips says that Francis had “taken sides” with Russian President Vladimir Putin by appealing to world leaders not to use military force on Syria.

Phillips then introduced Michael Walsh with a graphic labeling Walsh a “Vatican Historian.” Walsh is a former priest who called Pope Benedict XVI a “dictator.” Walsh called the Vatican “obviously incompetent and dysfunctional.”

Phillips also labeled Pope Francis’ call for mass prayer and fast against violence a “religious street protest.”

September 16
On Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show,” Jon Stewart, after joking inoffensively that according to Pope Francis, “gays are cool, priests can marry, and you don’t even have to believe in God to get to Heaven,” moved on to the following: “What, exactly, of Catholicism is left? I mean, you take away Jesus and celibacy—Catholic Church is just an ordinary restaurant that only serves wafers.” At this point, a woman was shown receiving Communion. This was followed by several obscenities.

October 23
On the E! show “Chelsea Lately,” priests and Germans were libeled by two of Chelsea Handler’s guests, Kurt Braunohler and Moshe Kasher.

The objectionable part began with a discussion of Bishop Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst, the German bishop who was suspended by Pope Francis for his opulent lifestyle.

Braunohler: “I love that the Catholic Church has like a zero tolerance policy on everything other than child abuse.”
Kasher: “It’s a German priest, so that’s a difficult set of circumstances. You know what I mean, it’s like—do I make out with that kid or do I kill that Jew.”

The remark by Kasher, which fails to distinguish between Germans and Nazis, suggests he doesn’t know the difference between those Germans who resisted Hitler—they were disproportionately Catholic—and those who followed the genocidal policies of the National Socialist Party run by an atheist who hated the Catholic Church. Both of the guests are ignorant, but that is hardly an excuse to smear all priests and Germans.

October 23
Jenny McCarthy went into a tizzy on “The View” about the Catholic Church because her mom was once denied an annulment. Jenny said her mom “cries during Communion because she watches all her friends go up there,” while she sits and weeps. Jenny said “I hope the pope gets smart and does something about it.”

McCarthy also shared her delusional story about being in the pope’s apartment. “I went to the Vatican [and] I actually went into the apartment, into the pope’s apartment and I was literally there and I’m going, oh my God, I could take a chunk of this gold cherub and feed a country.” This is not the first time she has made these claims. In 2012 on a TV program known as “Access Hollywood,” Jenny was more explicit. She credited a few “mafia guys” with sneaking her into the pope’s apartment in 1995; she said she even tried on some of his clothes.

November 7
CBS aired a rerun episode of “Comics Unleashed with Byron Allen,” which originally aired on February 26, 2007. The episode featured comic Lori Chase who said “I actually did that low carb Atkins thing, and it was really hard, by the third day I wanted bread so badly I became Catholic. And then, honestly they loved me there, because I would get so excited during communion, I was like yay! Its communion time! Oh yay! God this body of Christ is good (while making the sign of the cross). In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and the Holy toast, this is delicious.”

November 8
On the E! show “Chelsea Lately,” speaking of the inclusion of Pope Francis on the Forbes list of the most powerful people in the world, Chelsea Handler said, “So, and the new pope is on the list. That’s interesting since he’s never had penetration. How can he be that powerful?”

November 19
MSNBC’s coverage of a proposed law in Albuquerque, New Mexico that would ban abortions after 20 weeks, included two pro-abortion positions, one of which claimed to represent the Catholic Church. After MSNBC contributor and abortion-rights advocate Irin Carmon expressed her position host Thomas Roberts introduced Sara Hutchinson, a spokesperson for Catholics for Choice.  Roberts said, “Okay, so let’s talk to the Church side.”

Bill Donohue wrote to MSNBC saying: “There is nothing “Catholic” about Catholics for Choice, and everyone knows it. Would MSNBC allow someone from Jews for Jesus to speak for Jews?”

November 21
George Lopez was a guest on “The Arsenio Hall Show” and made several jokes about Pope Francis being Latino. After a remark about the pope’s cooking ability, Lopez said “It’s about time we have a pope who can actually make something other than altar boys nervous.”

December 3
E! network’s “Chelsea Lately” was particularly vicious.  The pretext to the vulgar comments made by Chelsea Handler, and guests Dan Levy and Josh Wolf, was the news that Pope Francis was once a bouncer, and rumors that he sneaks out at night to feed the poor.

Handler: “It’s a very popey thing to do, to help the homeless; I mean that’s kinda what he should be sneaking out and doing. It’s not like he can go to a glory hole [a hole in the stall in the men’s room in public places used by homosexuals for anonymous oral sex], I mean he could. I’m not making fun of Catholics. I’m thinking that he’s so liberal – he’s right around the corner from taking confession through a glory hole. That’s how advanced he is.”
Levy: “Catholics can’t win, because the only thing more embarrassing than being a child molester is being a bouncer at a [the familiar homosexual voice inflection is used] club.”
Wolf: “I was a doorman for a while which means—and all doormen are the same—which means at some point in time before he was pope this dude got a BJ [oral sex] in a bathroom from a girl wearing a tiara.”

December 6
Comedy Central’s new show “Adam Devine’s House Party” did not wait long to attack Catholics. Comedian Pete Davidson went after priests while talking about his experiences in Catholic school. “Here’s something that should never happen at an all boys school, don’t get an erection. There’s no excuse for that at all, it just shouldn’t happen ’cause there’s priests there, and priests are like sharks when you get a cut in the water. I got my priest to stop hitting on me though, it was easy, I introduced him to my little brother. I got an A!”

December 7
Comedy Central aired a one-hour special, “Chris D’Elia: White Male: Black Comic,” which was part of a two-hour performance recorded in November. The television special coincided with the release of the performance on CD and DVD by Comedy Central Records.

The D’Elia special featured a 13-minute segment that treated viewers to one of the most offensive anti-Christian attacks ever to be shown on TV; it made a deliberate effort to offend Catholics. Here’s a sample:

Speaking of Jesus, D’Elia said, “No way—he died for us so that we could all live? Awesome. He hung himself on the cross for that many days….”

Speaking of Catholic churches, D’Elia said, “There’s people on the stain glass windows with thorns around their head, they’re bleeding from the thorns, crying out of their eyeballs, their clothes are all ripped….”

Speaking of the Eucharist, D’Elia said, “They make you eat a guy’s body and you don’t even think about it. You’re just lining up—’I got to eat a guy’s body, yeah I got to eat a guy’s body man’….If this isn’t creepy enough, there’s a guy down there, you can drink his blood….”

December 10
Daniel Tosh of Comedy Central’s “Tosh.0” defamed the pope while reviewing headlines from 2013. Tosh said “What can I say about 2013 that hasn’t already been retweeted a thousand times … we have our first gay pope.” (A picture is shown of Pope Francis with a rainbow flag on his mitre and rainbow flags on his vestments.)

December 11
The guests on E! Network’s “Chelsea Lately” discussed Pope Francis’ selection as Time “Person of the Year”. Guest Whitney Cummings expresses her disapproval of the pope’s position on gay rights and states that popes wear dresses. Another guest, Moshe Kasher, responds “They don’t just wear dresses, they also have sex with men.”

December 12
ESPN refused to air a Christmas commercial from a Catholic children’s hospital because it included references to God and the birth of Jesus. Cardinal Glennon Children’s Medical Center submitted the advertisement to ESPN which said the hospital “celebrates the birth of Jesus and the season of giving, bringing hope to many children.” According to reports, the commercial was denied “due to religious advocacy.” Within a few hours of the story coming out in the media ESPN reversed its decision and agreed to run the commercial.

December 13
The “Pete Holmes Show” on TBS opened with a skit about a man trying to get into heaven. The man was met at the entrance by Holmes, who was portraying St. Peter. A very eccentric St. Peter denies the man entrance into heaven saying that “it’s a sausage party in there.” He continues “the last time I saw Jesus surrounded by 12 dudes was 2,000 years ago.” The skit says that heaven has been overhauled and St. Peter says that he can be bribed with drugs.

December 24
Television personality Joan Rivers attacked another star’s plastic surgeries. Rivers said “she has been touched up more than a choir boy at the Vatican.”

December 27
Just two days after Christmas, CBS re-aired the November 25, 2006 episode of “Comics Unleashed with Byron Allen” in which guest comedian Kyle Cease attacked the Holy Family and the Blessed Mother.

December 27
On the E! show “Fashion Police,” host Joan Rivers spoke about Miley Cyrus saying “at her age she has stuck her tongue out more times than the entire Catholic congregation taking communion in this country.”

Back to Top




JENNY McCARTHY’S CRACK-UP

On Wednesday, October 23, Jenny McCarthy cracked up on “The View” but no one seemed to notice. This was not a good sign.

Jenny went into a tizzy about the Catholic Church because her mom was once denied an annulment. The former porn star then went into detail about her mother’s problems.

Jenny said her mom “cries during Communion because she watches all her friends go up there,” while she sits and weeps. She did not say if her mom stops crying after Communion, or whether she cries all the way home. No matter, she said, “I hope the pope gets smart and does something about it.”

[Jenny, listen to Bill: If you know of any shortcuts on how to “get smart,” please test them on yourself before contacting the Holy Father.]

Jenny also shared her delusional story about being in the pope’s apartment. “I went to the Vatican [and] I actually went into the apartment, into the pope’s apartment and I was literally there and I’m going, oh my God, I could take a chunk of this gold cherub and feed a country.” Instead, she settled for a crucifix.

Last year on a TV program known as “Access Hollywood,” Jenny was more explicit. She credited a few “mafia guys” with sneaking her into the pope’s apartment in 1995; she said she even tried on some of his clothes. After slamming the Italians, she took a shot at Jews: she said her Jewish friends told her to steal a crucifix as a souvenir for her mother. She did not say whether her mom wept upon receipt, or whether she hocked it to feed a country, or at least a village.




JENNY McCARTHY’S CRACK-UP

article-2322116-19B35AEE000005DC-216_634x740Bill Donohue comments on today’s edition of “The View”:

Jenny McCarthy cracked up on TV today but no one seemed to notice. This is not a good sign.

Jenny went into a tizzy about the Catholic Church because her mom was once denied an annulment. The former porn star then went into detail about her mother’s problems.

Jenny said her mom “cries during Communion because she watches all her friends go up there,” while she sits and weeps. She did not say if her mom stops crying after Communion, or whether she cries all the way home. No matter, she said, “I hope the pope gets smart and does something about it.”

[Jenny, listen to Bill: If you know of any shortcuts on how to “get smart,” please test them on yourself before contacting the Holy Father.]

Jenny also shared her delusional story about being in the pope’s apartment. “I went to the Vatican [and] I actually went into the apartment, into the pope’s apartment and I was literally there and I’m going, oh my God, I could take a chunk of this gold cherub and feed a country.” Instead, she settled for a crucifix.

Last year, on “Access Hollywood,” Jenny was more explicit. She credited a few “mafia guys” with sneaking her into the pope’s apartment in 1995; she said she even tried on some of his clothes. After slamming the Italians, she took a shot at Jews: she said her Jewish friends told her to steal a crucifix as a souvenir for her mother. She did not say whether her mom wept upon receipt, or whether she hocked it to feed to a country, or at least a village.

Look for Jenny to either fully crash, or get booted, real soon. In the meantime, contact the stooge behind “The View,” Bill Geddie.

Contact: bill.geddie@abc.com




CBS’ MOONVES AND CHILD PORN

les-moonves-cbs-logo-hed-2012_0_0Bill Donohue comments on the way CBS CEO Les Moonves is handling the controversy over Spencer Clawson’s remarks made during the live feed of “Big Brother 15” on August 5:

Les Moonves has had several days to fire Spencer Clawson from the reality show, “Big Brother 15,” but he refuses to do so. However, two other contestants were terminated [from their day jobs] for making racial slurs.

On the live feed of the last episode, Clawson joked how he likes to masturbate to child pornography. “I love it when they’re around 3 or 4 years old,” he said. “My favorite ones are when you can tell they’re in a basement.” He added that masturbating to child porn “is my favorite thing there is.”

Moonves’ wife, Julie Chen, is the host of this show. Moonves said the show was a “social experiment” and that his wife “would kill me if I didn’t” watch every show. “What you see there [in the show] unfortunately is a reflection of how certain people feel in America.”

In 2007, radio shock jock Don Imus made a racial joke on CBS. Moonves didn’t say that his joke was “unfortunately a reflection of how certain people feel in America.” He simply fired him.

Moonves explained his firing by saying Imus “has flourished in a culture that permits a certain level of objectionable expression that hurts and demeans a wide range of people. In taking him off the air, I believe we take an important and necessary step not just in solving a unique problem, but in changing that culture, which extends far beyond the walls of our Company.”

Bottom line: CBS has infinitely more tolerance for those who joke about child porn than it does for those who tell racist jokes. Our culture cannot put up with the latter, but it must accommodate those who delight in the spectacle of 3 and 4-year-olds being sexually abused.

Contact Les Moonves: lmoonves@cbs.com




Media

Internet

May 13
The Washington Post/Newsweek blog “On Faith” ran a panel discussion on priestly celibacy. About half of the panelists disagreed with the Church’s position on this matter but were not vicious in their criticism. Four of the panelists showed their vitriol: Pamela Taylor, co-founder of Muslims for Progressive Values; Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite, former president of Chicago Theological Seminary; Willis E. Elliot, United Church of Christ and American Baptist minister; and Susan Jacoby, author. The following is a sampling from their posts.

• Taylor: “Furthermore, by disallowing intimacy for their priests, the church makes an even stronger statement. Women are not only spiritually inferior, but actually a source of spiritual pollution. Sexual intimacy, rather than being a celebration and reflection of God’s love, is a foul and dirty thing that degrades the pure (male) priest.”

• Thistlethwaite: “So many other issues, especially of inclusion, would be aided by eliminating priestly celibacy. Certainly, the ordination of women would become more likely…. It’s also possible that a Catholic church that affirmed the sexuality of its married priests as a good and honorable thing would be more open to the full inclusion of gay, lesbian, bi-sexual and transgendered people into the laity and the priesthood.”

• Elliot: “All the Roman Church’s restrictions on sex have been made exclusively by males, and its intensifying anti-sex has been and is a disgrace to the Christian religion…. I consider it blasphemous to give God a list of excluded categories: God is free to ‘call’ men and women—single, married, heterosexual, homosexual—and, I believe, does.”

• Jacoby: “As an atheist and an ex-Catholic, I cannot claim to be displeased at the spectacle of the Roman Catholic Church continuing to shoot itself in the foot by refusing to ordain women or to allow priests to marry.”

October 22
In the daily online magazine Religion Dispatches, Mary E. Hunt wrote a piece on the Catholic Church’s outreach to disaffected members of the Anglican Church. Hunt called the outreach a “theological scandal” and stated that the Vatican’s outreach was a move to “shore up its market share.”

October 29
On the online newsletter Dissident Voice, Ron Jacobs wrote a column bashing the Catholic Church for its outreach to disaffected members of the Anglican Church. In his column Jacobs said that the “Roman Church is catering to the homophobes in the Anglican formation” and that it was a “masterstroke of corporate raiding.”

October 30
On Dennis Miller’s Internet radio show, atheist Christopher Hitchens condemned Mother Teresa: “The woman was a fanatic and a fundamentalist and a fraud, and millions of people are much worse off because of her life, and it’s a shame there is no hell for your bitch to go.”

Bill Donohue responded to Hitchens’ attack stating: “I once told Hitchens that one of the real reasons he hates Mother Teresa has to do with his socialist ideology: he believes the state should care for the poor, not voluntary organizations, and he especially loathes the idea of religious ones servicing the dispossessed. Indeed, he sees in Mother Teresa the very embodiment of altruism, a virtue he cannot—with good reason—fully comprehend.”

In our press release we published Hitchens’ personal e-mail and he was roundly condemned, sometimes maliciously, by angry Catholics. Hitchens wrote to Donohue saying, “The first thing to say is that I felt remorse for employing the word ‘bitch’ as soon as it was out of my mouth.” Donohue immediately stated that all was forgiven: “When someone apologizes, Christians have no choice but to accept it.”

November 17 The Washington Post/Newsweek blog, “On Faith,” asked its panel the following question:

“U.S. Catholic Bishops are defending their direct involvement in congressional deliberations over health-care reform, saying that church leaders have a duty to raise moral concerns on any issue, including abortion rights and health care for the poor. Do you agree? What role should religious leaders have—or not have—in government policymaking?”

In responding to the question, a few of the panelists took unwarranted shots at the Catholic Church. Among those were John Shelby Spong, former bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Newark; Herb Silverman, president of the Secular Coalition for America; Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite and Susan Jacoby.

Spong:

• “The United States Roman Catholic Bishops always have a hidden agenda, which is to impose their faith and value systems on the rest of the nation.”

• “Catholic theology represents a patriarchal, bachelor view of human life and it is quite irrelevant to most of the issues with which 50 percent of the human race is dealing. Roman Catholic theology also operates out of a dated and ignorant definition of homosexuality and in the process violates the full humanity of gay and lesbian people.”

Silverman:

• “I also think Catholic bishops should have no moral authority when it comes to matters involving sex.”

• “Americans should be allowed to make up their own minds about the need for and morality of abortion, and should not be denied on the basis of the Catholic theology of sin.”

• “As far as I can tell, the biblical Jesus said nothing about abortion, but had a lot to say about the poor. Perhaps some Catholic bishops should ask themselves, ‘What would Jesus do?’”

Thistlethwaite:

• “The U.S. Catholic Bishops were apparently willing to put health care reform at risk, reform desperately needed by poor and middle class Americans, in order to do an 11th hour end run on abortion.”

• “The U.S. Catholic Bishops were profoundly in the wrong to play the lobby game with health care reform and put such a needed reform at risk. (Bold in original.) But even further, they were Bad Samaritans in the sense that the parable of Jesus teaches that people have a moral obligation to one another regardless of their differences.”

Jacoby:

• “What the church is doing, however, is attempting to hold Americans who do not agree with its views hostage.”

• “The church has not been successful at this kind of political blackmail since the 1930s and 1940s….”

• “And when anyone criticizes the church hierarchy for its actions on this or any other political front, the bishops cry ‘anti-Catholic.’”

• “The abortion issues is not the only front on which the church is attempting to blackmail secular government officials.”

• “The church levels charges of ‘anti-Catholicism’ whenever the media air out any ecclesiastical dirty linen.”

• “The real concern of the church hierarchy is dissent from lay Catholics, and that is why archbishops feathers’ are more ruffled when the last name of a critic is Dowd or O’Malley rather than Goldstein or Horowitz.”

• “Yes, the church has the right to lobby for its beliefs and use a minority of legislators to block the will of the majority. And those of us who disagree have a right and a duty to battle this religious blackmail of our secular government.”

Magazines

January
Oregon – The Source Weekly, a weekly arts and entertainment publication, featured on its cover an image of Our Lady of Perpetual Help holding President Barack Obama. The image of Obama replaced the original image of the Baby Jesus.

February

In the February edition of the Philadelphia Church of God’s monthly publication, The Philadelphia Trumpet, the Catholic Church was accused of controlling the politics of the European Union and assisting Germany in World War II.

In another article the Trumpet alleged that the Catholic Church was attempting to force the European Union into making Sunday observance mandatory by claiming that the Church put to death more than 50 million people during the Roman Empire.

April 13
In the weekly gay publication, Hotspots Magazine, an offensive ad appeared depicting a DJ dressed as Jesus ascending into heaven. The ad was for an event by DJ Roland Belmares at a gay club in West Palm Beach, Florida. The ad shows Belmares dressed as Jesus (sexually aroused under his robe). Beneath him are several disciples making crude comments including: “I guess that answers how he was hung,” “I’ve seen bigger” and “So would that be ‘Resurrection Wood’?”

July 20
The New Yorker featured an article by Paul Rudnick, entitled “Fun with Nuns,” that explained how he initially developed the movie, “Sister Act.” It also showed his hatred for nuns.

We wondered why a supposedly highbrow publication like The New Yorker would lower its bar by publishing such a hit piece on nuns. We also asked why Rudnick, a self-proclaimed “suburban New Jersey Jew,” would loathe nuns so much. We got a glimpse of what was really bothering Rudnick when he explained how “Sister Act” took form: “I was lying on my couch one afternoon in the late nineteen-eighties, trying to come up with an idea for a screenplay and I began to think about drag.”

In the article and on the magazine’s podcast, Rudnick said that his goal in creating “Sister Act” was to “subvert the Catholic Church.” As only he could explain, “The script called for actresses of all shapes and ages, although the Disney executives still squabbled over which nuns should be ‘fu**able.’”

Movies

March
We launched our campaign on the motion picture, “Angels & Demons,” that was based on the book by the same title; the author, Dan Brown, wrote The Da Vinci Code.

The movie was directed by Ron Howard, who directed “The Da Vinci Code,” and was produced by both producers of “The Da Vinci Code”: John Calley, who admitted that “The Da Vinci Code” was anti-Catholic; and Brian Grazer, who said he hoped that “Angels & Demons” was less reverential than their previous venture.

“Angels & Demons,” like “The Da Vinci Code,” is strewn with myths, lies and smears about the Catholic Church. Both are a curious blend of fact and fiction, and in both instances the tag team of Brown-Howard paints the Catholic Church in the worst possible light. To combat the movie, we published a booklet, “Angels & Demons: More Demonic Than Angelic.”

“Angels & Demons” alleges there is a secret society, the Illuminati, which is angry at the Church because of its purportedly anti-science bent. Originally claiming Galileo as one of its members, the group seeks to blow up the Vatican. The protagonist, Harvard professor Robert Langdon, is out to get them before the time bomb explodes.

To intentionally distort the historical record as a means to discredit Catholicism is morally indefensible. For example, Galileo died almost 150 years before the Illuminati were founded in 1776. Yet Brown and Howard say “it is a historical fact” that the Illuminati were formed in the 1600s. They say this because they need to justify trotting out their favorite martyr, Galileo, to beat up on the Church.

The portrayal of Catholicism as anti-science is bunk. Had it not been for the Church, the universities would have died during the Middle Ages. Had it not been for the Church, the Scientific Revolution would never have happened. After all, science did not take root in South America, Africa, the Middle East or Asia. It took place in Christian Europe.

Brown-Howard, as well as others associated with the film, can say all they want that they are not anti-Catholic. The booklet had devastating evidence to the contrary.

Our goal was not to call for a boycott of the movie, but to educate the public about the Brown-Howard agenda. Our worst fears were substantiated when a Canadian priest, dressed in civilian clothes, questioned the film crew for a few days about their thoughts on Catholicism. See the summary of this priest’s recollections of this matter at the end of the “Media” section.

See below for more about our action against “Angels & Demons.”

October 2
The trailer of the movie, “The Invention of Lying,” gave no indication of its atheistic-themed plot, but there was enough of a buzz about the agenda of screenwriter and director Ricky Gervais that we decided to check it out.

“The Invention of Lying” is not the kind of in-your-face assault that Hollywood often serves up, but therein lies its perniciousness: because this anti-Christian film is laced with some romance and humor, the message it sends is all the more sinister.

The movie centers on a world where lying doesn’t exist until the lead character realizes that he can say something that is not true. After he realizes this new talent, the character spins a tale to his dying mother about a place that resembles heaven, thus saving her from being consigned to an “eternity of nothingness.” He subsequently floats the idea that there is a God-like “Man in the Sky,” a belief accepted by most, though some cynics wonder why he allows calamities such as AIDS.

In mockery, the lead character later appears looking like a fat, scrubby version of Jesus and an image of him appears on a stained-glass window holding the two tablets (resembling those of Moses) on which he wrote his version of the Ten Commandments, posing as if on a cross. In the end, he and his girl are the only two people who know that “The Man in the Sky” isn’t real.

October 23
The film “Eulogy for a Vampire” opened in New York City. The film featured an all-male religious order of monks that “seem to spend no time in spiritual reflection but quite a lot of time groping one another,” according to the New York Times.

November 13
Before the movie “2012” opened in theaters nationwide, we got word that director Roland Emmerich handled Catholics and Muslims differently in the film.

When we first got word that the movie depicted St. Peter’s Basilica and the statue of Christ the Redeemer in Rio being blown up, we were unmoved. The reason being Emmerich is known as a guru of movies depicting mass destruction.   In 2008, Emmerich was quoted as saying, “I would like to erase all nations and religions.” But when asked why he did not show the destruction of Kaaba, the religious structure in the Grand Mosque in Mecca, he said, “I wanted to do that, I have to admit. You can actually let Christian symbols fall apart, but if you would do this with [an] Arab symbol, you would have…a fatwa.” So why is the Sistine Chapel designated for destruction? “We have to show how this gets destroyed…. I am against organized religion.” But yet, Muslims were spared.

Newspapers

February 1
In the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, syndicated satirist Mark Russell took a cheap shot at Pope Benedict XVI and the Church regarding the Bishop Williamson controversy. Russell called the pope “Herr Ratzinger” and said, “If the Catholic Church must get into the business of revising history, let’s just label the priest-pedophiles as ‘misguided youth counselors.’”

February 9
The New York Post ran a story titled, “Madonna Cavorts with Baby Jesus,” in which it mentions the musician’s relationship with male model Jesus Luz. The story also referenced a sexual photo shoot that the two of them did in W magazine.

February 26
On the day after Ash Wednesday, the New York Times ran a photo—approximately a quarter page in size—in its “A” section of a priest giving ashes to a woman. The photo, shot from above, showed no one in the church but the two of them. The caption below said, “The Rev. Ed Zogby marked a worshiper’s forehead with ashes at the Shrine of St. Elizabeth Ann Seton near Battery Park. Ash Wednesday is the first day of Lent.” There was no attendant story.

We called the church where the photo was taken to find out approximately how many Catholics showed up to receive ashes. The person we spoke to said that the photographer was there for hours and that “thousands” showed up to receive their ashes. One would never have gotten that impression from the photo. We also learned that the photographer was there at the times when the church was full, which made us wonder: why did the Times choose to use that particular photo and why in such a prominent placement?

In that same day’s New York Post there was a story about the Ash Wednesday crowd at St. Patrick’s Cathedral. “The largest Ash Wednesday congregation in recent memory,” the Post said. This was the exact opposite message of what the Times’ photo conveyed.

A few days after we asked our members to contact the Times’ Public Editor Clark Hoyt about the photo, he contacted Bill Donohue. He said that he thought we took offense where none was intended. He also said that the editor in charge of photography chose the photo because it was “a gorgeous photograph of a profound religious experience.”

March 6
The New York Times ran a 524-word story about six protesters who held a news conference on the steps of St. Patrick’s Cathedral criticizing then-New York Archbishop, Edward Cardinal Egan, and his successor, Archbishop Timothy Dolan, then of Milwaukee. On the opposite page, there was a picture of a demonstration at New York City Hall by union members; in a caption below the photo there were 39 words explaining the event. But there was no story accompanying it. Other New York newspapers said that “thousands” showed up at the City Hall rally.

In the Times’ story about the news conference at St. Patrick’s, it said that protesters questioned the figures released by the archdiocese on the number of priests accused of molesting minors; they also criticized Archbishop Dolan for not releasing the names of accused priests to the media. What the Times did not find newsworthy is the story about a rabbi who was accused of sexually abusing his own daughter for years, beginning when the girl was 9 years old. (The Daily News and the New York Post both covered this story, though neither gave it the kind of front-page attention they almost always give to miscreant priests.)

March 14-15
Newsday ran several stories on the two bills in the New York State legislature that addressed the sexual abuse of minors. One of the bills was sponsored by Margaret Markey and the other by Vito Lopez. The Church favored the Lopez bill because it applied the same standards to private and public institutions; the Markey bill gave public institutions a pass.

Never once did Newsday tell readers that the Markey bill did not apply to the public schools. The closest it came was in a news story that mentioned that Sean Dolan, spokesman for the Diocese of Rockville Centre, took issue with those like Michael Armstrong, a spokesman for the Markey bill. “While Dolan said the bill unfairly targets the Catholic Church, Armstrong said it would apply to victims in any institution—private or public—including schools.” Armstrong was wrong.

The week before, Paul Vitello of the New York Times wrote the following about the Markey bill “The disparity is built into the legal protections granted under existing state law to all public workers and agencies: to sue a public employee or agency for damages of any kind, a person is required to file a claim within 90 days of the alleged injury. A victim of childhood sex abuse by a public school teacher, for instance, has 90 days after turning 18 to file notice of a claim.” Newsday knew this, but failed to say so. Instead, it published a piece by Joye Brown telling the Diocese of Rockville Centre “to do nothing to stand in the lawmakers’ way.”

We contacted every parish on Long Island telling them about the lies and the anti-Catholicism of Newsday. It was only after the storm that we unleashed on the paper that Newsday began covering the Markey and Lopez bills fairly. The newspaper eventually endorsed the Lopez bill.

March 23
An editorial appeared in the New York Times that completely ignored a report—it appeared in the New York Post—that came out the day before that accusations of misconduct against New York City public school teachers were at an all time high. Nor did the New York Times run a story on a report regarding priestly sexual abuse: The report stated that a grand total of ten credible accusations were made in 2008 across the United States.

Anyone who is serious about seeking justice would begin by addressing the public schools. But not the New York Times. Its editorial never mentioned the public schools. Indeed, it began by saying, “For decades, priests who preyed sexually on children did so with shocking ease and impunity.”

Why were priests singled out? What was the motive? The editorial also talked about “shuttling abusive priests among parishes.” In the public schools, shuttling abusers is so common that it is called “passing the trash.”

On that same day the Times endorsed the Markey bill that would allow victims of sex abuse to sue even if the abuse took place in the 1960s, but only if the abuse occurred in a private institution. Under that bill, the current protections afforded public school teachers—alleged victims have only 90 days to file a claim—remain in place. Yet theTimes had the audacity to say that “The bill does not explicitly target any institution,” knowing full well that, unless the bill explicitly negated the 90-day rule for the public schools, the net effect would be to discriminate against Catholic schools.

The Times never mentioned the bill sponsored by Vito Lopez that would treat both private and public institutions the same way.

June 21 In the New York Times’ “Ethicist” column, Randy Cohen received a question from a Catholic religious member in formation to become a priest at a religious order university. He wondered if it was discriminatory for religious students to receive scholarships because the order does not admit women.

Cohen answered: “What is at issue, as you suggest, is sex discrimination: your order’s refusal to admit women and, more significant, your aspiring to the priesthood, a leadership position in your church, one closed to women. Calling a practice ‘religious’ does not exempt it from ethical scrutiny. You might regard yourself as preparing to be a beneficiary of entrenched workplace discrimination, an ethically troubling position.”

What we found to be an “ethically troubling position” was the selective indignation of this journalist and his blind insistence on passing judgment on the Catholic Church as viewed through the lens of secularism.

July 20
The New York Times printed a story about the death of Irish author Frank McCourt. As a sidebar, there was also a short excerpt from McCourt’s book, Angela’s Ashes, about the author’s recollection of his First Communion. Part of what the Times selected reads as follows:

“Then he [the priest] placed on my tongue the wafer, the body and blood of Jesus. At last, at last. It’s on my tongue. I draw it back. It stuck. I had God glued to the roof of my mouth. I could hear the master’s voice, Don’t let that host touch your teeth for if you bite God in two you’ll roast in hell for eternity. I tried to get God down with my tongue but the priest hissed at me, Stop that clucking and get back to your seat. God was good. He melted and I swallowed Him and now, at last, I was a member of the True Church, an official sinner.”

October 23
On the Washington Post/Newsweek blog, “On Faith,” British atheist Richard Dawkins said that the Catholic Church was “surely up there among the leaders” as “the greatest force for evil in the world.” He labeled the Eucharist a “cannibal feast,” adding that “possession of testicles is an essential qualification to perform the rite.” He also blamed the Church for sending missionaries “out to tell deliberate lies to AIDS-weakened Africans” regarding condoms. The Church’s outreach to Anglicans, he said, made it a “common pimp,” noting that those who convert “will be joining an institution where buggering altar boys pervades the culture.”

October 25
New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd made several disparaging statements about the Catholic Church. That they were wholly unrelated events made her article all the more invidious. She accused the Church of disrespecting nuns, took unwarranted shots at the pope and accused the Church of enabling “rampant pedophilia.”

October 26
James Carroll of the Boston Globe called the Catholic Church’s outreach to Anglicans “a cruel assault,” “an insult to loyal Catholic liberals” and “a slap at women and homosexuals.” He also characterized the outreach as a “preemptive exploitation of Anglican distress.”

Television

January
During an airing of the game show “Jeopardy,” the following answer was featured: “He denounces materialism from the balcony of a marble, gold-domed building…while wearing a giant gold cross.” The question for the contestants was, “Who is the pope?”

We never knew that “Jeopardy” had a political side. But now that we know, we’d like to offer the following entry: “They denounce bigotry on every occasion while constantly serving up anti-Catholic fare.” The right answer, of course, is the entertainment industry.

This is the kind of gratuitous slam that is only made against Catholics.

February 3
Link TV featured a three and a half minute video that mocked Catholicism. The media outlet is available as a basic service in more than 31 million homes that receive direct broadcast satellite TV.

The video, “Divine Food,” opens with a priest waking up to a rumbling noise that shakes the religious symbols and statues in his room. He proceeds to a Catholic church where he discovers several wafers near a cup (the implication is that they are consecrated Hosts). In a disrespectful manner, he chews on them vigorously and then admonishes the statues that are “looking at him.” He falls asleep in the church and when awakened he is asked to say Mass, which he refuses to do. The priest then makes large wafers out of dough and gives the pancake-like substance (which he calls the “Body of Christ”) to confused parishioners at Communion. The video ends when the priest drops the remaining “Hosts” into a dirty aquarium.

This video first aired in 2008, right after a professor from the University of Minnesota intentionally desecrated the Eucharist. At first we thought this was just another loony attack, but then we found out that Link TV is funded by foundations that support anti-Catholicism. To wit: the Ford Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Wallace Global Fund and George Soros’ Open Society Institute all fund Link TV, and all are generous contributors to Catholics for Choice, a notoriously anti-Catholic front group. Worse, of the three co-producers of the video, one of them—ITVS—is funded by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a public entity. So here we have the urbane bigots in the foundation world and a taxpayer-funded organization underwriting anti-Catholicism.

Within 24 hours Link TV removed the offensive video; the channel attributed the removal to the numerous complaints that it received from Catholic League supporters.

February 12
The NBC show, “30 Rock,” threw a few jabs at Catholics. Many of the familiar stereotypes were there: a church full of pregnant women, the alleged silliness of the confessional, questions regarding priestly celibacy, judgmental authority figures, etc.

What was new was the decision to focus on Latino Catholics. We can probably expect more of this as Latinos account for about a third of all Catholics in the United States. It remains to be seen how such fare will be received in their community.

February 16
Fox Network’s “House” promoted negative stereotypes of Catholic priests: the featured priest was a heavy drinker; he was hospitalized for hallucinating about Jesus; he was accused of being a pedophile; he hates his “job”; he lost his faith; the Church refused to believe his claims of innocence: he was bounced around from parish to parish; he was believed to have AIDS, etc.

Eventually, the doctors realized that the priest did not have AIDS and he was found innocent of impropriety. His faith was also restored. But it was too little, too late: the show milked the stereotypes to the hilt.

February 18
A sordid combination of sloppy journalism, which started in London and made its way to the U.S., wound up providing fodder for the bigots on the ABC-TV show, “The View.” After the panelists on the TV show were roundly criticized by Catholic League members, they went on the defensive the next day, and took a shot at Bill Donohue.

A news story appeared in The Times (of London) about “a study approved by the Vatican” showing that men are more given to lust, women to pride. This story was reprinted in the New York Post on the same day. Both newspapers identified Wojciech Giertych as “the personal theologian” to the pope. The next day, ABC News referred to the work as a “survey.”

On the same day, panelists on the ABC show, “The View,” discussed these news reports and took the occasion to slam Catholicism. Though the story was flawed, it didn’t stop the panelists. Here is an excerpt:

Whoopi Goldberg: Realize the Vatican is the last word in all things that are god. For some folks. But explain how you suddenly can write new sins. You can’t do that.

Joy Behar: The pope is supposed to be infallible. He can say whatever he wants and people believe it. That’s how it goes.

Goldberg: But that doesn’t make any sense.

Barbara Walters: What do you think is the biggest sin?  Behar: Lust amongst priests.

Elizabeth Hasselbeck: Pedophilia. They put that in the year after.

Goldberg: The biggest sin? …Intolerance.

Donohue immediately responded as follows:

“Goldberg is wrong to say that the Vatican is writing new sins: The report quotes one monsignor about a study whose author remains curiously undisclosed. Behar, another ex-Catholic, is wrong to speak so sweepingly about the pope’s infallibility: almost everything he says is of a fallible nature, and he has said absolutely nothing about this issue. And Hasselbeck, yet another ex-Catholic, was anxious to show that she also hates Catholics (she succeeded); she paints priests as child molesters. How ironic it is to hear them say it is the Church that is intolerant. If only they could hear themselves speak.”

The next day on the show, Joy Behar said that Donohue “says in a letter that we read that Barbara [Walters] should be squelching us from this type of thing.”

Donohue got the last word:

“What a bunch of incompetents. First of all, there is no study that was approved by the Vatican on the subject. There is a book by Dominican Father Giertych, and it was not ‘approved’ by the Vatican: his comments appeared in a Vatican newspaper,L’Osservatore Romano. He is not ‘the personal theologian’ to the pope; rather, he is theologian of the papal household. Moreover, he did not conduct a survey—he wrote a book. Both the terms ‘study’ and ‘survey’ suggest something scientific, and therefore distort the priest’s work.

“What Behar calls a ‘letter’ was actually a news release. More important, I never said Walters should be squelching them. What I said was that after we hit her with a New York Times ad in 2007 for tolerating anti-Catholicism, ‘she got the message and quieted her panelists.’”

March 12 On ABC’s “The View,” the panel discussed an article that appeared in a Vatican newspaper stating that the washing machine was the most liberating invention for women in the 20th century. Elizabeth Hasselbeck stated that the Church should not render an opinion on such matters because it does not ordain women.

March 29
On the Fox program, “Family Guy,” Jesus is shown sharing a glass of wine with a woman. He implies to her that it is His blood and the woman tries to leave. As she is leaving, Jesus locks the door so she cannot get away.

May 29
Denis Leary was a guest on “Larry King Live,” guest-hosted by Joy Behar. During the interview, the two discussed the Church and priestly celibacy in particular. They repeated the old anti-Catholic canard about the economic reasons for celibacy, i.e., it was invented for self-serving interests:

Leary: They want—it’s an organization that’s built on land ownership. That’s why…

Behar: Yes, that’s right.

Leary: That’s why they invented celibacy.

Behar: I know.

Leary: Celibacy did not come from the mouth of our Lord. It came from somebody in the Catholic Church saying, “Hey, look, those popes are having babies and the babies grow up and they want land.”

Behar: It came from the mouth of a real estate agent.

Leary: Exactly.

August 17-27
On August 17, we placed an ad in the daily edition of Variety magazine titled “THIS IS THE FINAL STRAW: SHOWTIME SHOULD NOT RENEW PENN & TELLER.” The ad was written in anticipation of the August 27 season finale on Penn & Teller’s show. We learned from both Penn Jillette and Showtime’s website that the show would attack the Vatican, graphically describing some of the show’s content. Given Penn & Teller’s vicious record of Catholic bashing, we had no doubt that this episode would be another crude attack.

We did not call for CBS, which owns Showtime, to cancel the episode. But we did cite previous examples of Penn & Teller’s malicious assaults, especially on Mother Teresa. We also noted that the duo had been warned before by CBS management but evidently they didn’t care.

On August 27, Penn & Teller launched one of the ugliest assaults on Catholics, or any other group, ever aired on television. Indeed, we know of no other show in the annals of television history that has even come close to this one-half hour of unrelieved hatred and bigotry. We held CBS, the owner of Showtime—a subscription-based channel—ultimately accountable.

It was right out of the Nazi playbook. The show, which was the season’s finale, was defamatory, obscene and outrageous. We put the episode on our website, just to show that we weren’t exaggerating. We also made a huge number of copies and sent the DVD to every bishop in the nation, as well as to other Catholics. Many non-Catholics, and select members of the religious and secular media, were sent the DVD as well.

The lies about the Catholic Church, to say nothing of the vile language used by Penn Jillette (the talking member of the duo), were positively astounding. Moreover, they never attempted to be comedic—from the beginning they advertised the show as payback for 2,000 years of alleged crimes. This was Julius Streicher, the Nazi propagandist, back from the grave.

Jillette spent a lot of time attacking the Vatican for its alleged attack on an Italian comedian, Sabina Guzzanti. He accused Pope Benedict XVI of seeking to throw “her sexy ass in jail,” and repeated this charge over and over again. Here’s what really happened.

In July 2008, Sabina (as she is known) deliberately set out to slam the Holy Father. It was at a rally against the alleged interference by the Vatican in Italian affairs that she let loose. She predicted that “within 20 years the pope will be where he ought to be—in Hell, tormented by great big poofter devils, and very active ones, not passive ones.”

As described by the U.K.’s TimesOnline, Sabina remarked that not only would the pope be sentenced to eternal damnation, he would be “tormented by homosexual demons.” She told her audience that within twenty years, the power-hungry Vatican would be in charge of hiring all public school teachers in Italy.

Italian authorities initially considered reprisals against Sabina, but dropped the case almost as soon as it opened it. As for the Vatican, it never threatened any punitive action—it was all a lie that Jillette made up to discredit the Church. Moreover, one Jesuit scholar, Father Bartolomeo Sorge, said, “We Christians put up with many insults, it is part of being a Christian, as is forgiveness. I feel sure the pope has already forgiven those who insulted him on Piazza Navona.” Indeed, the sharpest words delivered by the Vatican were a mild rebuke: it expressed “profound displeasure with the offensive words about the Holy Father.”

The other big issue that Jillette seized upon was a 1962 Vatican document which he said was an organized cover-up of priestly sexual abuse. It was nothing of the sort.

The document that Jillette referred to never applied to sexual misconduct—it applied only to sexual solicitation in the confessional. The purpose of the document was to protect the privacy of the confessional while at the same time guarding against solicitation made by the priest. Not only was it not a cover-up, it provided for stiff penalties: a priest found guilty of sexual solicitation in the confessional could be thrown out of the priesthood. The penitent, for his or her part, was under strict guidelines to report any improper advances to the local bishop. In other words, not only did Jillette lie—he totally misrepresented what the document said.

Similarly, accusations that Pope Benedict XVI, in his role as Cardinal Ratzinger, was in charge of overseeing the matter of priestly sexual abuse are pure nonsense. As a matter of fact, he had nothing to do with this issue until after the scandal became a major story in 2002, and then he moved with dispatch to deal with the issue in a serious manner. In other words, Jillette unfairly maligned the pope’s character.

Not to be outdone, Jillette threw out old barbs about the Crusades, never indicating that the Crusades were a defensive response by Catholics against Muslim thuggery.

The Inquisition card was also played, and again the implication was that the Catholic Church’s role was nefarious: the truth is that the Church instituted a system of justice to deal with an otherwise unjust campaign launched by civil authorities against suspected heretics. Abuses took place, but it is more the stuff of Black Legends to charge the Catholic Church with wholesale abuse.

Slavery, women and gays were other subjects touched on by Jillette. Too bad the viewers never learned that the first public person in history to protest slavery was St. Patrick. Too bad they never learned how women far outnumber men in attendance at Mass and as lay persons in service to the Church. Too bad they were never told that no private institution has a better record of servicing AIDS patients than the Catholic Church. But then again, the facts would have gotten in the way of Jillette’s screed.

The show blamed the Catholic Church for every evil in history. Jillette said “intolerance, greed, paranoia, hypocrisy and callous disregard for human suffering” was the hallmark of the Catholic Church. Others on the show branded the Church an “amoral” and “power hungry” institution that is just worried about its “cash flow.”

The show was strewn with incredible lies about the Church. Spokesmen for Catholics for Choice and Dignity—two anti-Catholic groups that lie about their Catholic status—were in the show, as was a representative of the sue-happy professional victims’ group, SNAP. Each ridiculed the Church.

Even if half of what they said were true, there is still no defensible reason for CBS to allow these two hate-filled men to unleash their fury. No other group in American society is subjected to this kind of savagery. Let’s face it: every group has its dirty laundry, real and contrived, yet CBS wouldn’t dare give the green light to a thrashing of gays, Indians, Muslims, African Americans, Jews and others.

Bill Donohue spoke to a high-ranking CBS official about this matter. While the spokesperson was courteous and took the call seriously, it was not enough: We said CBS had to sever its ties from Penn & Teller once and for all.

Because we could not let this go unanswered, we asked our members to write to Mr. Leslie Moonves, Chairman, CBS Television Network, 7800 Beverly Blvd., Rm. 23, Los Angeles, CA 90036-2112.

September 17
On ABC’s “The View,” the panel was discussing the videos showing ACORN workers helping an undercover investigator dressed as a prostitute set up a prostitution business. Whoopi Goldberg went on a rant saying that there are boneheads in every segment of society and that ACORN should not be dismantled. Goldberg also listed Washington, Wall Street and the banking industry as examples. Joy Behar, a repeat anti-Catholic offender, took a cheap shot at the Catholic Church saying, “They haven’t dismantled the Catholic Church and they have some boneheads in there.”

October 1
On the premiere episode of the Headline News program, “The Joy Behar Show,” the repeat-offender host took another cheap shot at the Catholic Church.  In discussing the Roman Polanski situation, Behar said, “Listen, if he were a priest, they would have sent him to another parish.”

October 9
Comedian Sarah Silverman appeared on Bill Maher’s HBO show attacking the Vatican. She began her monologue bemoaning the plight of world hunger, and then found a solution: “What is the Vatican worth, like 500 billion dollars? This is great, sell the Vatican, take a big chunk of the money, build a gorgeous condominium for you and all your friends to live in…and with the money left over, feed the whole f—ing world.”

Speaking of the pope, Silverman continued, “You preach to live humbly, and I totally agree. So, now maybe it’s time for you to move out of your house that is a city. On an ego level alone, you will be the biggest hero in the history of ever. And by the way, any involvement in the Holocaust, bygones….”

Silverman closed by saying, “If you sell the Vatican, and you take that money, and you use it to feed every single human being on the planet, you will get crazy p–sy. All the p–sy.” In the background, there was a drawing of a penis.

“Silverman’s assault on Catholicism is just another example of HBO’s corporate irresponsibility,” we said in a news release. “Time and again, if it’s not Bill Maher thrashing the Catholic Church, it’s one of his guests. There is obviously something pathological going on there: Silverman’s filthy diatribe would never be allowed if the chosen target were the Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem and the state of Israel.”

October 18
Fox broadcasted the 20th edition of “The Simpsons” Halloween special. One of the three stories, “Don’t Have a Cow, Mankind,” was about people in Springfield becoming zombies after eating hamburgers infected with tainted meat.

After 28 days, Bart tries one of the infected hamburgers, but proves immune to the virus. He becomes the “Chosen One” and the Simpsons go off to find the safe zone where the rest of the uninfected people have gathered. When they get there a guard says, “Welcome, son. To survive, all we must do is eat your flesh.” Marge responds by saying, “What kind of civilized people eat the body and blood of their savior?”

October 25
On HBO’s “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” actor and show creator Larry David uses a bathroom in a Catholic home where a portrait of Jesus is next to the toilet. As he is urinating, David splatters some of the urine on the picture of Jesus and neglects to clean it off. After this occurs, a Catholic woman enters the bathroom, sees the picture and concludes that Jesus is crying. She then summons her mother and they both fall to their knees in prayer.

To the media, Bill Donohue asked: “Was Larry David always this crude? Would he think it comedic if someone urinated on a picture of his mother?” Donohue also noted that HBO—which only a few weeks prior ran Sarah Silverman’s insults towards Catholics—particularly likes to dump on Catholics.

On the Fox News Channel’s “Fox and Friends,” Donohue made it clear that this was not humor: “I have been dealing with this stuff for years. I’m just so sick and tired of it. There’s only one group they can bash with impunity.”

The largest Jewish and Muslim civil rights organizations, the ADL and CAIR, also supported our position.

November 12
While discussing the Vatican on NBC’s “Jay Leno Show,” Leno made a joke regarding the Church’s investigation of the possibility of life on other planets. He said, “Apparently, they ran out of parishes to send these priests to so they are looking to outer space.”

November 23
On the MSNBC program “Hardball,” host Chris Matthews interviewed Providence Bishop Thomas Tobin regarding Rep. Patrick Kennedy’s remarks against the Church’s opposition to the endorsement of abortion in the health care bill. For the first part of the interview, Matthews was aggressive but not out of control. In the second part of the interview, Matthews proceeded with an extended and insulting lecture to the bishop. It was clear that he had no interest in a discussion on the question of the morality and legality of abortion.

We pointed out that no non-Catholic would treat a Catholic bishop this way, and if they did, it would have been considered an anti-Catholic attack. We noted that too many liberal Catholics, especially Irish Catholics, think they are exempt from the same standards of civility that apply to others.

December 7
On Robin Williams’ HBO special, “Weapons of Self Destruction,” the comedian referred to Pope Benedict XVI as a Nazi. In the profanity-laced bit, Williams insinuated that the College of Cardinals elected a “Nazi” as a joke following the death of Pope John Paul II.

Excerpts from “Angels & Demons” Booklet

Angels & Demons, if read purely for entertainment purposes, has its merits. Most of the characters that are pure fiction—like the young priest who before he became pope fell in love with a nun (they wanted a child, but also wanted to remain chaste, so they settled for artificial insemination)—are so absurd as to be unbelievable. But, as withThe Da Vinci Code, the real problem lay in Brown’s deceit: he takes real life characters, like Copernicus and Galileo; and real life organizations, like the Illuminati; and real life issues, like science and religion. And then he blows them to smithereens.

Brown’s defenders say he is a novelist and no one should take what he says seriously. The problem is that Brown alternates between promoting his books as fiction and as fact. He wants to have it both ways. Moreover, Hollywood would never make a movie about the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and it wouldn’t matter a whit if it was made on the grounds that it was nothing but fiction. What would matter is that a film version of this slanderous anti-Jewish tract might promote intolerance.

Dan Brown is a master of disinformation. In other words, he knows what the historical record says, and yet he deliberately misrepresents it. Worse, he does so with malice: His willful distortion of the truth is done to smear the Catholic Church. He wants the reader to believe that the Catholic Church sees science as the enemy and will stop at nothing to get its way.

Catholicism and Science

The most invidious stereotype that Brown seizes upon in this book is the idea that the Catholic Church is anti-science. Nothing could be further from the truth.

“For the last fifty years,” says professor Thomas E. Woods, Jr., “virtually all historians of science…have concluded that the Scientific Revolution was indebted to the Church.” Sociologist Rodney Stark argues that the reason why science arose in Europe, and nowhere else, is because of Catholicism. “It is instructive that China, Islam, India, ancient Greece, and Rome all had a highly developed alchemy. But only in Europe did alchemy develop into chemistry. By the same token, many societies developed elaborate systems of astrology, but only in Europe did astrology lead to astronomy.”

The Catholic role in pioneering astronomy is not questioned. J.L. Heilborn of the University of California at Berkeley writes that “The Roman Catholic Church gave more financial aid and social support to the study of astronomy for over six centuries, from the recovery of ancient learning during the late Middle Ages into the Enlightenment than any other, and, probably, all other institutions.” The scientific achievements of the Jesuits, alone, reached every corner of the earth.

What was it about Catholicism that made it so science-friendly, and why did science take root in Europe and not some place else? Stark knows why: “Because Christianity depicted God as a rational, responsive, dependable, and omnipotent being, and the universe as his personal creation. The natural world was thus understood to have a rational, lawful, stable structure, awaiting (indeed, inviting) human comprehension.”

Galileo

If Galileo was punished for maintaining that the earth revolves around the sun, then why wasn’t Copernicus punished? After all, Copernicus broached this idea before Galileo toyed with it, and like Galileo, he was also a Catholic. The difference is that Copernicus was an honest scientist: he was content to state his ideas in the form of a hypothesis. Galileo refused to do so, even though he could not prove his hypothesis.

If the Catholic Church was out to get Galileo from the get-go, then how does one explain why he was celebrated for his work in Rome in 1611? Why did Pope Paul V embrace him? Why did he become friends with the future pope, Urban VIII? Quite frankly, Galileo never got into trouble before he started insisting that the Copernican system was positively true. When he first agreed to treat it as a hypothesis, or as a mathematical proposition, he suffered not a whit.

In 1624, Urban VIII gave Galileo medals and other gifts, and pledged to continue his support for his work. According to Woods, “Urban VIII told the astronomer that the Church had never declared Copernicanism to be heretical, and that the Church would never do so.” This, of course, is not what Brown wants us to believe.

If the Catholic Church was so anti-science, why did Pope Benedict XIV grant an imprimatur to the first edition of the complete works of Galileo? He did this in 1741. And if further proof is needed to demonstrate that Galileo’s abrasiveness had something to do with the Church’s response consider that scientists like Father Roger Boscovich continued to explore Copernican ideas at the same time Galileo was found “vehemently suspected of heresy.” It should also be noted that Catholics were never forbidden from reading Galileo. Moreover, scientific books circulated freely during and after his censure.

Anti-Catholicism

Before “The Da Vinci Code” was released, co-producer John Calley admitted to theNew York Times that the movie was “conservatively anti-Catholic.” How telling it is, then, that the New York Times reported that co-producer Brian Grazer wants the movie version of Angels & Demons “to be less reverential than ‘The Da Vinci Code.’” That about seals it. The final nail in the coffin was unwittingly offered by the movie crew of “Angels & Demons.”

Father Bernard O’Connor is a Canadian priest and an official with the Vatican’s Congregation for Eastern Churches. In 2008 he was in Rome while director Ron Howard was shooting the movie. O’Connor had two encounters with the film crew, informal discussions with about 20 of them. He was dressed casually so no one knew he was a priest. They spoke openly, thinking he was just “an amiable tourist.”

One self-described “production official” opined, “The wretched Church is against us yet again and is making problems.” Then, speaking of his friend Dan Brown, he offered, “Like most of us, he often says that he would do anything to demolish that detestable institution, the Catholic Church. And we will triumph. You will see.” When Father O’Connor asked him to clarify his remarks, the production official said, “Within a generation there will be no more Catholic Church, at least not in Western Europe. And really the media deserves to take much of the credit for its demise.”

“The public is finally getting our message,” boasts the movie official. The message is clearly defined: “The Catholic Church must be weakened and eventually it must disappear from the earth. It is humanity’s chief enemy. This has always been the case.” He credits “radio, television, Hollywood, the music and video industries, along with just about every newspaper which exists, all saying the same thing.” He also cites the role which colleges and universities have played in undermining Catholicism.

All of which begs the question: Why do Dan Brown, and many in the media, Hollywood and academe, hate the Catholic Church so much? Perhaps the most succinct answer comes from Langdon in Angels & Demons (see pp. 136-137). When asked whether he believes in God, he admits it is not easy. What really gets him is the Ten Commandments, and other religious strictures: “The claim that if I don’t live by a special code I will go to hell. I can’t imagine a God who would rule that way.”

Storm Brews Over “Angels & Demons”

Following the publishing of our booklet, Ron Howard attacked Donohue in a piece on the Huffington Post. Referring to the booklet, the director said, “Mr. Donohue’s booklet accuses us of lying when our movie trailer says the Catholic Church ordered a brutal massacre to silence the Illuminati centuries ago. It would be a lie if we had ever suggested our movie is anything other than a work of fiction….” Howard also said that “most of the hierarchy of the Church” would enjoy the film; he also denied being anti-Catholic.

Hypocrisy also marked “Angels & Demons.” There was no Muslim assassin in the film as there was in the book, but of course, Howard had no problem culturally assassinating Catholicism. And Howard wasn’t the only hypocrite: co-producer Brian Grazer, and the production studio, Sony, were guilty of giving Muslims a pass while sticking it to Catholics.

After 9/11, NBC toyed with the idea of doing a mini-series on the events of that tragic day. Grazer was in line to produce it, but it never materialized due to its controversial nature. More important, Grazer said it was his goal to “humanize” Muslims, specifically denouncing any attempt to “demonize” them. Evidently, it’s just Catholics who are worthy of being demonized.

In 2008, less than four days before the release of the video game LittleBigPlanet, Sony recalled every copy before it hit the stores. Why? One of the background songs contained two Arabic expressions found in the Koran, and that was considered a no-no. A Sony spokesperson said, “We have taken immediate action to rectify this and we sincerely apologize for any offense this may have caused.” But there was no action to rectify the propaganda against Catholicism in “Angels & Demons,” and there certainly was no apology.

Even India’s Censor Board asked that a disclaimer be put in the movie saying that the film is a work of fiction. It also asked that certain scenes be deleted. It explained its position by saying, “It has its guidelines and its duty, and if it thinks a film, any film, disparages a religious community or hurts religious feelings, it should take action under its code.”

We also asked that a disclaimer be inserted everywhere the film was shown. We noted that the disclaimer was needed because Ron Howard and Dan Brown alternate promoting their work as fact and fiction. Thus, to set the record straight we suggested they come clean and do in the rest of the world what they agreed to do in India—insert a disclaimer indicating its fictional nature; we did not ask that scenes be deleted because that would be an infringement on the artistic rights of those associated with the film.

If Sony, the film’s producer, and Howard had no problem putting in a disclaimer in India—which is only two percent Christian—they surely could have done the same wherever the movie is shown. When Sony released “The Merchant of Venice” it opened with a disclaimer condemning anti-Semitism. Howard opened “A Beautiful Mind” with a disclaimer noting how the film contains fictional aspects not found in the book by that name. Catholics, obviously, expected the same degree of respect but we weren’t given it.

The Vatican apparently had a three track strategy to deal with “Angels & Demons”: ban Ron Howard from filming on its grounds; low ball any negative comments before the movie debuted; and slam it for its stereotypical portrayals while conceding its cinematic value.

Howard was denied access to the Vatican because of his previous exploitation of the Catholic Church in “The Da Vinci Code.” The Vatican also decided that reticence was the best way to handle “Angels & Demons”; it did not want Howard to use any negative comments it might make to boost sales.




HATE SPEECH AGAINST POPE

In July, Cathy Lynn Grossman of USA Today wrote an article on Pope Benedict XVI’s call for a God-centered global economy. We thought the pope’s comments would be embraced by every reasonable person, regardless of faith. We were wrong. Here is a sample of the vitriol that was unleashed against the pope in the “Comments” section following Grossman’s article. All selections are exactly as they appeared:

“‘If the Catholic right is against the redistribution of wealth, they’re against the pope.’”

“Let the Pope be the first to follow his own advice. The Catholic Church is one of the wealthiest entities on the planet. How about the Church giving its tithe from all its members and redistributing it to the poor instead of filling its coffers. How about the Vatican selling off its billions of dollars worth of art to feed the masses. The Pope should set the example.”

“There is NO God, the bible is fake, the church is a scam.”

“Bennie Baby, you want to help the world, tell all your third world followers (i.e. Mexico) to quit breeding like rabbits. It sure would help out here in California.”

“Nazi pope still spreading lies huh?”

“It is time for the Catholic church to put birth control and condoms in the back of every Catholic church. That is a good start for a ‘God centered’ global economy.”

“The catholic church, wow, what a track record they have. They killed and tortured what they considered non-believers. They were implicit in the plan on exterminating Jews, they’ve been abusing children for centuries, even covering up for priests involved in such heinous acts and so now they want sensible people to take their advice on money:-)! What a bunch of nutters!”

“Why is the Pope addressing humankind? Doesn’t he have a direct line to God? If he doesn’t, why does he think anyone should listen to what he has to say?”

“This Pope was a friend of the Nazis.”

“Christianity is like 2,000 year sold and this nutter acts like humans were lost for the thousands of years andgenerations until the catholic church came along with their raping of the local economy and holy wars,LOL!”

“God centered. OMG!!! That’s rich, senior pope. Sure just have all paychecks directly deposited into the vaticans bank account, and they will cut a separate check to you depending on actual need. I’d pay just to shut this fool up for a year or two.”

“Note to pope: Mind your own business and stay out of politics. If you want to help the world, start by quitting the collections during mass, sell your gold chalices and sell your massive display of power–your cathedral–and use the proceeds to help developing countries. Finally, ask for forgiveness for the brutal Crusades, and several inquisitions where you murdered thousands of people.”

“The Catholic church has so much money they could probably fund an end to at least half the world’s hunger tomorrow (ever been to the Vatican?) Rome has a lot to answer for after decades of shaming people into not using birth control despite the fact that they are too poor to feed their babies and despite the resulting spread of HIV in places like Africa. I certainly hope the Pope’s ‘redistribution of wealth’ includes liquidation of some of the church’s assets to be distributed to the poverty stricken.”

“Lets start a new inquisition and if your not a christian we throw you to the lions.”

“What is this crackpot trying to do. I guess religion and in the name of god has not killed enough people already. You would think that by learning from the past these idiots would just keep thier mouths shut.”

“This pope is disgusting and sickening.. He is a celebritie and he is not religious. I dont understand the catholic. No offense to catholic people but you have a right to know why Catholic is a FALSE religious. Read about 10 commandment being broken. They break GOD LAW!!!!!!! THEY DID!!!! ….”

“Catholic is DISGUSTING.. Oh yeah.. the bible book never mention about Catholic or any religious.. The bible itsel fis just a GOD and the Word.. what religious am I, you ask ? No, none..”