BIGOTRY MARKS DEBATE OVER CALIFORNIA ASSISTED-SUICIDE BILL
June 7, 2007
The California assembly is expected to vote next week
on a bill that would allow doctors to provide a lethal drug dose to
patients who have less than six months to live, are mentally competent
and have requested the drug; they would administer it themselves. In
the course of the debate over this bill, anti-Catholic bigotry has
flared. Addressing this issue today is Catholic League president Bill
Donohue:
“Those who believe in the ethics of assisted suicide
should make their case without engaging in unethical conduct. They
have not done so. On radio shows throughout California, commercials
placed by Californians for Compassionate Choices have called into
question the constitutional right of Catholic clergymen to speak to
this issue. These spots mirror the invective employed against Los
Angeles Archbishop Roger Cardinal Mahony that appear in the group’s
press releases.
“On May 7, Compassionate Choices said, ‘How can
lawmakers follow the dictates of the Catholic Church rather than
legislate on behalf of ALL Californians?’ So when Catholic leaders
speak out, they’re dictating to lawmakers, but when others speak out,
they’re engaging in dialogue. Do even those who voice such nonsense
believe what they say? Even worse is the lie, found on the group’s
website, that says there is ‘a well-funded pressure campaign to force
Vatican dogma on all terminally ill Californians.’ This is pure
unadulterated demagoguery, and they know it.
“There is one Catholic that Compassionate Choices
likes, and that’s Daniel C. Maguire, the embittered ex-priest
theologian from Marquette University. In his letter to the lawmakers,
Maguire did what he always does—spin the truth. ‘Catholic theology is
broader and more nuanced than Vatican theology,’ he said. So if
Vatican theology is not Catholic theology, is it Buddhist? And if the
Vatican is not the source of Catholic theology, what is? The musings
of Maguire?
“California
lawmakers are free to decide what to do, but they also have a moral
obligation to denounce bigotry. They should do so without delay.”
Share this Article
Printer Friendly
More News Releases »
|